Literature DB >> 21520882

Model-based optoacoustic inversions with incomplete projection data.

Andreas Buehler1, Amir Rosenthal, Thomas Jetzfellner, Alexander Dima, Daniel Razansky, Vasilis Ntziachristos.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Optoacoustic imaging is an emerging noninvasive imaging modality that can resolve optical contrast through several millimeters to centimeters of tissue with diffraction-limited resolution of ultrasound. Yet, quantified reconstruction of tissue absorption maps requires optoacoustic signals to be collected from as many locations around the object as possible. In many tomographic imaging scenarios, however, only limited-view or partial projection data are available, which has been shown to generate image artifacts and overall loss of quantification accuracy.
METHODS: In this article, the recently introduced interpolated-matrix-model optoacoustic inversion method is tested in different limited-view scenarios and compared to the standard backprojection algorithm. Both direct (TGSVD) and iterative (PLSQR) regularization methods are proposed to improve the accuracy of image reconstructions with their performance tested on simulated and experimental data.
RESULTS: While for full-view tomographic data the model-based inversion has been generally shown to attain higher reconstruction accuracy compared to backprojection algorithms, the incomplete tomographic datasets lead to ill-conditioned forward matrices and, consequently, to error-prone inversions, with strong artifacts following a distinct ripple-type pattern. The proposed regularization techniques are shown to stabilize the inversion and eliminate the artifacts.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, it has been determined that the regularized interpolated-matrix-model-based optoacoustic inversions show higher accuracy than reconstructions with the standard backprojection algorithm. Finally, the combination of model-based inversion with PLSQR or TGSVD regularization methods can lead to an accurate reconstruction of limited-projection angle optoacoustic data and practical systems for optoacoustic imaging in many realistic cases where the full-view dataset is unavailable.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21520882     DOI: 10.1118/1.3556916

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  18 in total

1.  Algebraic determination of back-projection operators for optoacoustic tomography.

Authors:  Amir Rosenthal
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  Accelerating image reconstruction in three-dimensional optoacoustic tomography on graphics processing units.

Authors:  Kun Wang; Chao Huang; Yu-Jiun Kao; Cheng-Ying Chou; Alexander A Oraevsky; Mark A Anastasio
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Basis pursuit deconvolution for improving model-based reconstructed images in photoacoustic tomography.

Authors:  Jaya Prakash; Aditi Subramani Raju; Calvin B Shaw; Manojit Pramanik; Phaneendra K Yalavarthy
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 3.732

4.  A simple Fourier transform-based reconstruction formula for photoacoustic computed tomography with a circular or spherical measurement geometry.

Authors:  Kun Wang; Mark A Anastasio
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Investigation of iterative image reconstruction in three-dimensional optoacoustic tomography.

Authors:  Kun Wang; Richard Su; Alexander A Oraevsky; Mark A Anastasio
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Constrained Inversion and Spectral Unmixing in Multispectral Optoacoustic Tomography.

Authors:  Lu Ding; Xose Luis Dean-Ben; Neal C Burton; Robert W Sobol; Vasilis Ntziachristos; Daniel Razansky
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 10.048

7.  Model-Based X-Ray-Induced Acoustic Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Prabodh Kumar Pandey; Siqi Wang; Hari Om Aggrawal; Kristina Bjegovic; Salime Boucher; Liangzhong Xiang
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 2.725

8.  High resolution tumor targeting in living mice by means of multispectral optoacoustic tomography.

Authors:  Andreas Buehler; Eva Herzog; Angelica Ale; Bradley D Smith; Vasilis Ntziachristos; Daniel Razansky
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2012-04-01       Impact factor: 3.138

9.  Manganese (II) Chelate Functionalized Copper Sulfide Nanoparticles for Efficient Magnetic Resonance/Photoacoustic Dual-Modal Imaging Guided Photothermal Therapy.

Authors:  Renfa Liu; Lijia Jing; Dong Peng; Yong Li; Jie Tian; Zhifei Dai
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2015-07-25       Impact factor: 11.556

10.  Optoacoustic imaging and tomography: reconstruction approaches and outstanding challenges in image performance and quantification.

Authors:  Christian Lutzweiler; Daniel Razansky
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 3.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.