Literature DB >> 21520836

Experience of micromultileaf collimator linear accelerator based single fraction stereotactic radiosurgery: tumor dose inhomogeneity, conformity, and dose fall off.

Linda X Hong1, Madhur Garg, Patrick Lasala, Mimi Kim, Dennis Mah, Chin-Cheng Chen, Ravindra Yaparpalvi, Dinesh Mynampati, Hsiang-Chi Kuo, Chandan Guha, Shalom Kalnicki.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Sharp dose fall off outside a tumor is essential for high dose single fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) plans. This study explores the relationship among tumor dose inhomogeneity, conformity, and dose fall off in normal tissues for micromultileaf collimator (mMLC) linear accelerator (LINAC) based cranial SRS plans.
METHODS: Between January 2007 and July 2009, 65 patients with single cranial lesions were treated with LINAC-based SRS. Among them, tumors had maximum diameters < or = 20 mm: 31; between 20 and 30 mm: 21; and > 30 mm: 13. All patients were treated with 6 MV photons on a Trilogy linear accelerator (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) with a tertiary m3 high-resolution mMLC (Brainlab, Feldkirchen, Germany), using either noncoplanar conformal fixed fields or dynamic conformal arcs. The authors also created retrospective study plans with identical beam arrangement as the treated plan but with different tumor dose inhomogeneity by varying the beam margins around the planning target volume (PTV). All retrospective study plans were normalized so that the minimum PTV dose was the prescription dose (PD). Isocenter dose, mean PTV dose, RTOG conformity index (CI), RTOG homogeneity index (HI), dose gradient index R50-R100 (defined as the difference between equivalent sphere radius of 50% isodose volume and prescription isodose volume), and normal tissue volume (as a ratio to PTV volume) receiving 50% prescription dose (NTV50) were calculated.
RESULTS: HI was inversely related to the beam margins around the PTV. CI had a "V" shaped relationship with HI, reaching a minimum when HI was approximately 1.3. Isocenter dose and mean PTV dose (as percentage of PD) increased linearly with HI. R50-R100 and NTV50 initially declined with HI and then reached a plateau when HI was approximately 1.3. These trends also held when tumors were grouped according to their maximum diameters. The smallest tumor group (maximum diameters < or = 20 mm) had the most HI dependence for dose fall off. For treated plans, CI averaged 2.55 +/- 0.79 with HI 1.23 +/- 0.06; the average R50-R100 was 0.41 +/- 0.08, 0.55 +/- 0.10, and 0.65 +/- 0.09 cm, respectively, for tumors < or = 20 mm, between 20 and 30 mm, and > 30 mm.
CONCLUSIONS: Tumor dose inhomogeneity can be used as an important and convenient parameter to evaluate mMLC LINAC-based SRS plans. Sharp dose fall off in the normal tissue is achieved with sufficiently high tumor dose inhomogeneity. By adjusting beam margins, a homogeneity index of approximately 1.3 would provide best conformity for the authors' SRS system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21520836     DOI: 10.1118/1.3549764

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  9 in total

1.  A feasibility dosimetric study on prostate cancer : are we ready for a multicenter clinical trial on SBRT?

Authors:  Carmelo Marino; Elena Villaggi; Giulia Maggi; Marco Esposito; Lidia Strigari; Elisa Bonanno; Giusi R Borzì; Claudia Carbonini; Rita Consorti; David Fedele; Christian Fiandra; Isidora Ielo; Tiziana Malatesta; Maria Rosa Malisan; Anna Martinotti; Renzo Moretti; Barbara Nardiello; Caterina Oliviero; Stefania Clemente; Pietro Mancosu
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2015-03-08       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  Evaluating which plan quality metrics are appropriate for use in lung SBRT.

Authors:  Ravindra Yaparpalvi; Madhur K Garg; Jin Shen; William R Bodner; Dinesh K Mynampati; Aleiya Gafar; Hsiang-Chi Kuo; Amar K Basavatia; Nitin Ohri; Linda X Hong; Shalom Kalnicki; Wolfgang A Tome
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Dosimetric comparison of different treatment modalities for stereotactic radiotherapy.

Authors:  Shih-Ming Hsu; Yuan-Chun Lai; Chien-Chung Jeng; Chia-Ying Tseng
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-09-16       Impact factor: 3.481

4.  Dosimetric comparison between RapidArc and HyperArc techniques in salvage stereotactic body radiation therapy for recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Hsiu-Wen Ho; Steve P Lee; Hisu-Man Lin; Hsiao-Yun Chen; Chun-Chiao Huang; Shih-Chang Wang; Ching-Chieh Yang; Yu-Wei Lin
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 3.481

5.  A physically meaningful relationship between R50% and PTV surface area in lung SBRT.

Authors:  Dharmin D Desai; Ivan L Cordrey; E L Johnson
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  The new SRS/FSRT technique HyperArc for benign brain lesions: a dosimetric analysis.

Authors:  Hsiu-Wen Ho; Ching-Chieh Yang; Hsiu-Man Lin; Hsiao-Yun Chen; Chun-Chiao Huang; Shih-Chang Wang; Yu-Wei Lin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Feasibility and potential advantages using VMAT in SRS metastasis treatments.

Authors:  Maria Jose Perez-Calatayud; Antonio Vicente Menendez; Francisco Javier Celada-Alvarez; Antonio Jose Conde-Moreno; Mariola Bernisz; Françoise Lliso; Vicente Carmona; Jose Gimeno-Olmos; Carlos Botella; Jose Perez-Calatayud
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2021-02-25

8.  Swine Atrioventricular Node Ablation Using Stereotactic Radiosurgery: Methods and In Vivo Feasibility Investigation for Catheter-Free Ablation of Cardiac Arrhythmias.

Authors:  Marwan M Refaat; Jad A Ballout; Patrick Zakka; Mostafa Hotait; Karine A Al Feghali; Ibrahim Abu Gheida; Charbel Saade; Mukbil Hourani; Fady Geara; Malek Tabbal; Pierre Sfeir; Wassim Jalbout; Wael Al-Jaroudi; Abdo Jurjus; Bassem Youssef
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 5.501

9.  Strategies to optimize stereotactic radiosurgery plans for brain tumors with volumetric-modulated arc therapy.

Authors:  David Wang; Albert DeNittis; Yibing Hu
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 2.102

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.