BACKGROUND: Oncolytic adenoviruses are an attractive strategy for treating cancers resistant to conventional treatments. However, their systemic utility could be limited as a result of the high prevalence of pre-existing immunity towards the vector. Furthermore, neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) may prevent successful intravenous readministration of the same agent. Previous preclinical reports indicate that the NAb response can be partially overcome by modifying the adenoviral fiber knob. However, to date, this strategy has not been evaluated in human patients. METHODS: Twenty-four human patients with advanced cancer were treated with two cycles of oncolytic adenoviruses, featuring three capsid variants: unmodified adenovirus serotype 5 (Ad5), serotype 5 with RGD motif in the HI-loop of the fiber knob (Ad5-RGD) and serotype 5 carrying fiber knob from serotype 3 (Ad5/3). A virus with different fiber structure was used for the second round of treatment and patient serum was analyzed for a neutralizing effect. RESULTS: All patients developed NAbs against the virus that they were treated with. However, the magnitude and velocity of the response varied considerably. When measured just before the second treatment cycle, a differential in serum NAb titer against the first versus second virus was seen in 83% of cases, suggesting that even minor changes in the fiber knob can circumvent neutralization in cancer patients. No correlation between NAb titers and outcome variables was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The results obtained in the present study extend previous preclinical reports into human cancer patients and suggest that modification of the fiber knob is a feasible strategy for circumventing the NAb response in patients receiving multiple rounds of oncolytic adenoviruses.
BACKGROUND: Oncolytic adenoviruses are an attractive strategy for treating cancers resistant to conventional treatments. However, their systemic utility could be limited as a result of the high prevalence of pre-existing immunity towards the vector. Furthermore, neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) may prevent successful intravenous readministration of the same agent. Previous preclinical reports indicate that the NAb response can be partially overcome by modifying the adenoviral fiber knob. However, to date, this strategy has not been evaluated in humanpatients. METHODS: Twenty-four humanpatients with advanced cancer were treated with two cycles of oncolytic adenoviruses, featuring three capsid variants: unmodified adenovirus serotype 5 (Ad5), serotype 5 with RGD motif in the HI-loop of the fiber knob (Ad5-RGD) and serotype 5 carrying fiber knob from serotype 3 (Ad5/3). A virus with different fiber structure was used for the second round of treatment and patient serum was analyzed for a neutralizing effect. RESULTS: All patients developed NAbs against the virus that they were treated with. However, the magnitude and velocity of the response varied considerably. When measured just before the second treatment cycle, a differential in serum NAb titer against the first versus second virus was seen in 83% of cases, suggesting that even minor changes in the fiber knob can circumvent neutralization in cancerpatients. No correlation between NAb titers and outcome variables was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The results obtained in the present study extend previous preclinical reports into humancancerpatients and suggest that modification of the fiber knob is a feasible strategy for circumventing the NAb response in patients receiving multiple rounds of oncolytic adenoviruses.
Authors: Pascal R A Buijs; Judith H E Verhagen; Casper H J van Eijck; Bernadette G van den Hoogen Journal: Hum Vaccin Immunother Date: 2015 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: K-W Peng; R Myers; A Greenslade; E Mader; S Greiner; M J Federspiel; A Dispenzieri; S J Russell Journal: Gene Ther Date: 2012-04-05 Impact factor: 5.250
Authors: Basav N Hangalapura; Laura Timares; Dinja Oosterhoff; Rik J Scheper; David T Curiel; Tanja D de Gruijl Journal: J Gene Med Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 4.565
Authors: Maria Rajecki; Mirkka Sarparanta; Tanja Hakkarainen; Mikko Tenhunen; Iulia Diaconu; Venla Kuhmonen; Kalevi Kairemo; Anna Kanerva; Anu J Airaksinen; Akseli Hemminki Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-03-07 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Wojciech K Panek; J Robert Kane; Jacob S Young; Aida Rashidi; Julius W Kim; Deepak Kanojia; Maciej S Lesniak Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2017-09-11
Authors: Belal M Azab; Rupesh Dash; Swadesh K Das; Sujit K Bhutia; Siddik Sarkar; Xue-Ning Shen; Bridget A Quinn; Paul Dent; Igor P Dmitriev; Xiang-Yang Wang; David T Curiel; Maurizio Pellecchia; John C Reed; Devanand Sarkar; Paul B Fisher Journal: J Cell Physiol Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 6.384