Literature DB >> 21520315

A model and scoring system to predict outcome of intrauterine pregnancies of uncertain viability.

C Bottomley1, V Van Belle, A Pexsters, A T Papageorghiou, F Mukri, E Kirk, S Van Huffel, D Timmerman, T Bourne.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To define the incidence and outcome of intrauterine pregnancy of uncertain viability (PUV) and to develop and assess the performance of a model and a scoring system to predict ongoing viability.
METHODS: Of 1881 consecutive women undergoing transvaginal ultrasonography, a cohort of 493 women with an empty gestational sac < 20 mm in mean diameter, gestational sac < 25 mm in mean diameter and containing yolk sac only or an embryonic pole < 6 mm in maximum length and without visible heart activity were followed until the end of the first trimester. Women with multiple pregnancies or who underwent termination of pregnancy were excluded. Outcome measures were pregnancy viability at initial 7-14-day follow-up and first-trimester viability at 11-14 weeks. The data were split randomly into two sets (two-thirds and one-third, respectively) in order to first develop and then test a mathematical model and a 'simple' model in the prediction of viability at each outcome point, based on maternal demographics, ultrasound features and symptoms. The performance of each system was assessed by receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis and calibration plots on a test dataset.
RESULTS: The incidence of PUV in this population was 29.2% (549/1881). Of the 493 pregnancies with initial (7-14 days) follow-up available, 307 (62.3%) were viable at this time and of the 444 pregnancies with follow-up at the end of the first trimester, 225 (50.7%) were still viable. Initial (7-14-day) viability was predicted by the model with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.837 (95% CI, 0.791-0.884) in the training dataset and 0.821 (95% CI, 0.756-0.885) in the test dataset. First-trimester (11-14-week) viability was predicted by the model with an AUC of 0.788 (95% CI, 0.734-0.842) in the training dataset and 0.774 (95% CI, 0.701-0.848) in the test dataset. The scoring system performed slightly worse than did the model, but had the advantage of being easily applicable.
CONCLUSIONS: When early pregnancy viability cannot be established immediately with ultrasound, use of either a logistic regression model or a scoring system allows an individualized prediction of first-trimester outcome.
Copyright © 2011 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21520315     DOI: 10.1002/uog.9007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  6 in total

1.  Progesterone to prevent miscarriage in women with early pregnancy bleeding: the PRISM RCT.

Authors:  Arri Coomarasamy; Hoda M Harb; Adam J Devall; Versha Cheed; Tracy E Roberts; Ilias Goranitis; Chidubem B Ogwulu; Helen M Williams; Ioannis D Gallos; Abey Eapen; Jane P Daniels; Amna Ahmed; Ruth Bender-Atik; Kalsang Bhatia; Cecilia Bottomley; Jane Brewin; Meenakshi Choudhary; Fiona Crosfill; Shilpa Deb; W Colin Duncan; Andrew Ewer; Kim Hinshaw; Thomas Holland; Feras Izzat; Jemma Johns; Mary-Ann Lumsden; Padma Manda; Jane E Norman; Natalie Nunes; Caroline E Overton; Kathiuska Kriedt; Siobhan Quenby; Sandhya Rao; Jackie Ross; Anupama Shahid; Martyn Underwood; Nirmala Vaithilingham; Linda Watkins; Catherine Wykes; Andrew W Horne; Davor Jurkovic; Lee J Middleton
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 4.014

Review 2.  Rationalising the change in defining non-viability in the first trimester.

Authors:  Fernando Infante; Ishwari Casikar; Uche Menakaya; George Condous
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2015-12-31

3.  [Prognosis of pregnant women with vaginal bleeding during the first trimester: about 239 cases at the Kamenge University Hospital in Bujumbura].

Authors:  Etienne Kajibwami Birindwa; Jean-Baptiste Sindayirwanya; Salvatore Harerimana
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2020-04-09

4.  Terminology for describing normally sited and ectopic pregnancies on ultrasound: ESHRE recommendations for good practice.

Authors:  Emma Kirk; Pim Ankum; Attila Jakab; Nathalie Le Clef; Artur Ludwin; Rachel Small; Tina Tellum; Mira Töyli; Thierry Van den Bosch; Davor Jurkovic
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2020-12-16

5.  Defining safe criteria to diagnose miscarriage: prospective observational multicentre study.

Authors:  Jessica Preisler; Julia Kopeika; Laure Ismail; Veluppillai Vathanan; Jessica Farren; Yazan Abdallah; Parijat Battacharjee; Caroline Van Holsbeke; Cecilia Bottomley; Deborah Gould; Susanne Johnson; Catriona Stalder; Ben Van Calster; Judith Hamilton; Dirk Timmerman; Tom Bourne
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2015-09-23

6.  Mifepristone and misoprostol versus misoprostol alone for the management of missed miscarriage (MifeMiso): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Justin J Chu; Adam J Devall; Leanne E Beeson; Pollyanna Hardy; Versha Cheed; Yongzhong Sun; Tracy E Roberts; C Okeke Ogwulu; Eleanor Williams; Laura L Jones; Jenny H La Fontaine Papadopoulos; Ruth Bender-Atik; Jane Brewin; Kim Hinshaw; Meenakshi Choudhary; Amna Ahmed; Joel Naftalin; Natalie Nunes; Abigail Oliver; Feras Izzat; Kalsang Bhatia; Ismail Hassan; Yadava Jeve; Judith Hamilton; Shilpa Deb; Cecilia Bottomley; Jackie Ross; Linda Watkins; Martyn Underwood; Ying Cheong; Chitra S Kumar; Pratima Gupta; Rachel Small; Stewart Pringle; Frances Hodge; Anupama Shahid; Ioannis D Gallos; Andrew W Horne; Siobhan Quenby; Arri Coomarasamy
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 79.321

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.