| Literature DB >> 21520003 |
Mareike Rickmann1, Juergen Krauter, Kathrin Stamer, Michael Heuser, Gustavo Salguero, Eva Mischak-Weissinger, Arnold Ganser, Renata Stripecke.
Abstract
Some 30% of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients display an internal tandem duplication (ITD) mutation in the FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) gene. FLT3-ITDs are known to drive hematopoietic stem cells towards FLT3 ligand independent growth, but the effects on dendritic cell (DC) differentiation during leukemogenesis are not clear. We compared the frequency of cells with immunophenotype of myeloid DC (mDC: Lin(-), HLA-DR(+), CD11c(+), CD86(+)) and plasmacytoid DC (pDC: Lin(-), HLA-DR(+), CD123(+), CD86(+)) in diagnostic samples of 47 FLT3-ITD(-) and 40 FLT3-ITD(+) AML patients. The majority of ITD(+) AML samples showed high frequencies of mDCs or pDCs, with significantly decreased HLA-DR expression compared with DCs detectable in ITD(-) AML samples. Interestingly, mDCs and pDCs sorted out from ITD(+) AML samples contained the ITD insert revealing their leukemic origin and, upon ex vivo culture with cytokines, they acquired DC morphology. Notably, mDC/pDCs were detectable concurrently with single lineage mDCs and pDCs in all ITD(+) AML (n = 11) and ITD(-) AML (n = 12) samples analyzed for mixed lineage DCs (Lin(-), HLA-DR(+), CD11c(+), CD123(+)). ITD(+) AML mDCs/pDCs could be only partially activated with CD40L and CpG for production of IFN-α, TNF-α, and IL-1α, which may affect the anti-leukemia immune surveillance in the course of disease progression.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21520003 PMCID: PMC3150660 DOI: 10.1007/s00277-011-1231-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Hematol ISSN: 0939-5555 Impact factor: 3.673
Patients’ characteristics for the first cohort (mDCs or pDCs analyses) and second cohort (mDCs or pDCs or mDC/pDC analyses) (p ≤ 0.05)
| First cohort | First cohort |
| Second cohort | Second cohort | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, median (range) years | 62 (32–84) | 56.5 (18–82) | 0.17 | 60.38 (44–83) | 56.8 (35–79) |
| Sex (no./%) | |||||
| Male | 18 (55) | 25 (60) | 0.67 | 6 (54) | 6 (60) |
| Female | 15 (45) | 17 (40) | 5 (46) | 4 (40) | |
| WBC median (×109/L) | 95.19 | 65.69 | 0.1 | 67.7 | 63.52 |
| FAB (no./%) |
|
| 0.29 |
|
|
| M0 | 2 (11) | 2 (10) | 1 (9) | 0 (0) | |
| M1 | 1 (6) | 5 (24) | 2 (18) | 2 (16) | |
| M2 | 4 (22) | 3 (14) | 1 (9) | 0 (10) | |
| M3 | 3 (17) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
| M4 | 3 (17) | 5 (24) | 3 (27) | 3 (25) | |
| M5 | 5 (27) | 6 (28) | 5 (45) | 3 (25) | |
| Not FAB classified | (15) | (21) | (1) | (4) | |
| Cytogenetics (no./%) | |||||
| Favorable | 3 (9) | 3 (7) | 0.13 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| Intermediate | 26 (79) | 28 (67) | 7 (63) | 7 (58) | |
| Adverse | 2 (6) | 10 (24) | 2 (18) | 4 (33) | |
| Missing | 2 (6) | 1 (2) | 2 (15) | 1 (10) | |
| Probability of relapse (%) | 15 | 24 | 0.51 | N.A. | N.A. |
| Allo-transplantation (%) | 21 | 31 | 0.33 | 36 | 33 |
| Complete remission to date (CR) (no./%) | 15 (45) | 22 (54) | 0.48 | 4 (36) | 9 (75) |
FAB French–American–British classification, FLT3 FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3, ITD internal tandem duplication, WBC white blood cells, N.A. not applicable
aFour of the patients in this cohort were previously included in FLT3-ITD + cohort 1
bSeven of the patients in this cohort were previously included in FLT3-ITD- cohort 1
Fig. 1Experimental design and validation of methods. a Schema of the flow cytometry analyses for detection of mDCs and pDCs. b Frequencies of DCs detectable in fresh (black) versus thawed (grey) PBMCs obtained from healthy donors (n = 10) do not differ significantly (p values of mDCs, 0.15; pDCs, 0.44.). c Frequencies of cells with mDC and pDC immunophenotypes as total cells or with additional expression of the activation marker CD86 and maturation marker CD83 (numbers indicate the average and standard deviation for each analyses; n = 10)
Fig. 2Flow cytometry analyses of cells with DC immunophenotype in AML diagnostic samples. a Frequencies of mDCs, and b pDCs detected in FLT3-ITD+ (upper graphs) and FLT3-ITD- AML samples (lower graphs). All analyses indicated significantly higher frequencies of mDCs and pDCs in ITD+ and ITD− AML samples in comparison with DCs analyses in healthy subjects (p < 0.05). The panels on the right side show representative FACS analyses samples with the gating strategy
Fig. 3Flow cytometry analyses of HLA-DR expression in AML cells. a Mean fluorescence intensity (M.F.I.) of HLA-DR expression on mDCs showing significant (asterisk) differences in the expression level comparing healthy (n = 10), ITD− (n = 42) and ITD+ (n = 33) PBMC. b M.F.I. of HLA-DR expression on pDCs
Fig. 4Sequencing of PCR-ITD mutational insert product from ITD+ patients. In addition to the w.t. FLT3 amplification product, the ITD mutational insert is detectable in the original AML patient samples and in the sorted DCs
Fig. 5Morphological analyses of cytospin/Giemsa preparations of FLT3-ITD+ AML diagnostic samples prior and post-sorting of mDCs and pDCs. AML samples obtained from three patients and containing high frequencies of mDCs (a) or pDCs (b) before and after sorting resemble leukemia blasts. c ITD+ AML-mDCs after sorting and culture with GM-CSF/IL-4 and maturation with CD40L show cell enlargement and veils. d ITD+ AML pDCs after sorting and culture with IL-3 and maturation with CD40L show cell enlargement and high granularity
Fig. 6Immunophenotypic detection of mDCs/pDCs’ mixed lineages. a Schematic presentation of flow cytometry analyses. b Average frequency of mixed lineage mDCs/pDCs, single mDCs and pDCs obtained for ITD+ and ITD− patients
Fig. 7Functional analyses of double positive CD11c/CD123 mDCs/pDCs in ITD+ AML samples of three patients. a Gating approach for detection of mDCs/pDCs. b Frequency of mDC/pDCs with detectable intracellular cytokines after stimulation with CD40L or CpG
Frequency of double positive mDCs/pDCs and single mDCs and pDCs in 11 ITD+ AML samples
| AML sample | WBC | FAB | % DCs in PBMC | % mDC/pDC in DCs | % mDC in DCs | % pDC in DCs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A: High mDC/pDC and high mDC frequencies | ||||||
| 5 | 6.3 | M4 | 23.28 | 79.30 | 18.17 | 2.53 |
| 6 | 56.2 | M5a | 39.2 | 34.95 | 64.79 | 0.25 |
| 7 | 30.3 | M4/5 | 34.7 | 64.54 | 30.84 | 4.61 |
| 8 | 216 | M0 | 34.1 | 39.00 | 60.41 | 0.59 |
| 9 | 107 | M5a | 39.1 | 69.80 | 29.92 | 0.25 |
| 10 | 1.5 | M1 | 3.57 | 27.74 | 60.50 | 11.76 |
| B: High mDC/pDC and high pDC frequencies | ||||||
| 1 | 69.9 | M2 | 39.04 | 35.00 | 0.48 | 64.52 |
| 2 | 46.3 | M5 | 52.02 | 64.28 | 6.62 | 29.10 |
| 11 | 65.5 | M5 | 11.00 | 73.09 | 8.09 | 18.82 |
| 4 | 79.0 | N.A. | 11.55 | 55.16 | 10.32 | 34.52 |
| C: High mDC/pDC and low mDCs or pDCs | ||||||
| 3 | 66.7 | M5 | 45.97 | 90.12 | 5.21 | 4.67 |
Despite the fact that mDCs/ pDCs were observed in all AML samples, most of the samples showed high frequency of mDCs (A), and some samples showed also high frequencies of pDCs (B) or comparable frequencies of mDCs and pDCs (C)
AML acute myeloid leukemia, FAB French–American–British classification, FLT3 FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3, ITD internal tandem duplication, WBC white blood cells, N.A. not applicable, PBMC peripheral blood mononuclear cell, DCs dendritic cells, pDC plasmacytoid dendritic cell, mDC myeloid dendritic cell
Frequency of double positive mDCs/pDCs and single mDCs and pDCs in 12 ITD− AML samples
| AML sample | WBC | FAB | % DCs in PBMC | % mDC/pDC in DCs | % mDC in DCs | % pDC in DCs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A: High mDC/pDC and high mDC frequencies | ||||||
| 1 | 4.7 | M1 | 58.26 | 36.09 | 57.57 | 6.32 |
| 2 | 182 | N.A. | 9.9 | 87.36 | 10.20 | 2.41 |
| 3 | 76 | M4 | 9.15 | 59.22 | 34.09 | 6.67 |
| B: High mDC/pDC and high pDC frequencies | ||||||
| 4 | 5.2 | N.A. | 8.11 | 81.37 | 3.33 | 15.29 |
| 5 | 34 | M5b | 53.71 | 71.37 | 0.36 | 28.23 |
| 6 | 6.8 | M4 | 27.44 | 58.71 | 1.75 | 39.54 |
| 7 | 129.5 | N.A. | 52.79 | 61.53 | 1.52 | 36.94 |
| C: High mDC/pDC and high mDCs or pDCs | ||||||
| 8 | 0.7 | M4eo | 23.97 | 60.52 | 18.22 | 21.23 |
| 9 | 69 | N.A. | 31.8 | 62.33 | 18.21 | 19.47 |
| 10 | 18.4 | M5 | 21.97 | 61.63 | 15.66 | 22.70 |
| 11 | 23.2 | M1 | 8.08 | 77.60 | 13.24 | 9.16 |
| 12 | 115.7 | M5 | 1.57 | 82.17 | 7.01 | 10.83 |
The samples varied relative to the majority of mDCs (A), pDCs (B), but for most of the cases comparable frequencies of mDCs and pDCs were observed (C)
AML acute myeloid leukemia, FAB French–American–British classification, WBC white blood cells, N.A. not applicable, DCs dendritic cells, PBMC peripheral blood mononuclear cell, pDC plasmacytoid dendritic cell, mDC myeloid dendritic cell