Literature DB >> 21519309

Intravenous lidocaine versus thoracic epidural analgesia: a randomized controlled trial in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery using an enhanced recovery program.

Mingkwan Wongyingsinn1, Gabriele Baldini, Patrick Charlebois, Sender Liberman, Barry Stein, Franco Carli.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: Laparoscopy, thoracic epidural analgesia, and enhanced recovery program (ERP) have been shown to be the major elements to facilitate the postoperative recovery strategy in open colorectal surgery. This study compared the effect of intraoperative and postoperative intravenous (IV) lidocaine infusion with thoracic epidural analgesia on postoperative restoration of bowel function in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resection using an ERP.
METHODS: Sixty patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery were prospectively randomized to receive either thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA group) or IV lidocaine infusion (IL group) (1 mg/kg per hour) with patient-controlled analgesia morphine for the first 48 hours after surgery. All patients received a similar ERP. The primary outcome was time to return of bowel function. Postoperative pain intensity, time out of bed, dietary intake, duration of hospital stay, and postoperative complications were also recorded.
RESULTS: Mean times and SD (95% confidence interval) to first flatus (TEA, 24 [SD, 11] [19-29] hrs vs IL, 27 [SD, 12] [22-32] hrs) and to bowel movements (TEA, 44 ±19 [35-52] hrs vs IL, 43 [SD, 20] [34-51] hrs) were similar in both groups (P = 0.887). Thoracic epidural analgesia provided better analgesia in patients undergoing rectal surgery. Time out of bed and dietary intake were similar. Patients in the TEA and IL groups were discharged on median day 3 (interquartile range, 3-4 days), P = 0.744. Sixty percent of patients in both groups left the hospital on day 3.
CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative and postoperative IV infusion of lidocaine in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resection using an ERP had a similar impact on bowel function compared with thoracic epidural analgesia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21519309     DOI: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e31820d4362

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med        ISSN: 1098-7339            Impact factor:   6.288


  30 in total

1.  Is there a benefit to additional neuroaxial anesthesia in open nephrectomy? A prospective NSQIP propensity score analysis.

Authors:  Amr Mahran; Kirtishri Mishra; Danly Omil-Lima; Bissan Abboud; Michael Wang; Jason Jankowski; Robert Abouassaly; Lee Ponsky; Irma Lengu; Laura Bukavina
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 2.  Factors predicting outcome from enhanced recovery programmes in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  David E Messenger; Nathan J Curtis; Adam Jones; Emma L Jones; Neil J Smart; Nader K Francis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Mid-Low Rectal Cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Short- and Long-Term Outcomes.

Authors:  Jin-bo Jiang; Kun Jiang; Yong Dai; Ru-xia Wang; Wei-zhi Wu; Jing-jing Wang; Fu-Bo Xie; Xue-Mei Li
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) versus patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) in laparoscopic colectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Konstantinos Perivoliotis; Chamaidi Sarakatsianou; Stavroula Georgopoulou; George Tzovaras; Ioannis Baloyiannis
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Clinical practice guideline for enhanced recovery after colon and rectal surgery from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) and Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES).

Authors:  Joseph C Carmichael; Deborah S Keller; Gabriele Baldini; Liliana Bordeianou; Eric Weiss; Lawrence Lee; Marylise Boutros; James McClane; Scott R Steele; Liane S Feldman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Guidelines for perioperative care for pancreaticoduodenectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations.

Authors:  Kristoffer Lassen; Marielle M E Coolsen; Karem Slim; Francesco Carli; José E de Aguilar-Nascimento; Markus Schäfer; Rowan W Parks; Kenneth C H Fearon; Dileep N Lobo; Nicolas Demartines; Marco Braga; Olle Ljungqvist; Cornelis H C Dejong
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Minimally invasive postoperative analgesia for pain relief after minimally invasive surgical procedures: the role of local anesthetic infusion.

Authors:  M Beaussier
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 3.781

8.  Guidelines for perioperative care in elective rectal/pelvic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(®)) Society recommendations.

Authors:  J Nygren; J Thacker; F Carli; K C H Fearon; S Norderval; D N Lobo; O Ljungqvist; M Soop; J Ramirez
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 9.  Effect of epidural analgesia on bowel function in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Suhail A Khan; Haseeb A Khokhar; A R H Nasr; Eleanor Carton; Sherif El-Masry
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  The effect of intravenous lidocaine infusion on bispectral index during major abdominal surgery.

Authors:  Patrick Bazin; James Padley; Matthew Ho; Jennifer Stevens; Erez Ben-Menachem
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 2.502

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.