M Neovius1, J F Simard, L Klareskog, J Askling. 1. Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. martin.neovius@ki.se
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate sick leave and disability pension in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in relation to the initiation of biological and non-biological antirheumatic therapies in clinical practice. METHODS: Patients aged 19-60 years initiating non-biological mono (n=2796) or combination disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy (n=973), or biological agents (n=4787) were identified in the Swedish Rheumatology Quality Register between 1999 and 2007. Sick leave and disability pension data (1995-2010) were retrieved from national registers. RESULTS: During the year before the start of mono DMARD, combination DMARD and biological treatment, 10%, 12% and 43% of patients received disability pension benefits, respectively. The corresponding combined annual sick leave and disability pension days were 78 (54+25), 132 (105+27) and 190 (79+111). Irrespective of treatment type, initiators were characterised by a history of increasing sick leave and disability pension. Treatment start was associated with a break in this trajectory: sick leave decreased while disability pension increased, resulting in a net stabilisation of total days. Higher levels of days on sick leave and disability pension at treatment start were observed in patients initiating biologics in 1999 (236 days/year) compared with 2007 (150 days/year; p<0.001), but the trajectory thereafter remained largely similar and contrasted markedly with the level in the general population. CONCLUSION: Sick leave and disability pension increased rapidly before the initiation of antirheumatic therapy, which was associated with a halt but not a reversal of this development. Work ability is a metric of importance for clinical practice, signalling large remaining needs in the RA population, and the need for intervention earlier in the disease process.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate sick leave and disability pension in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in relation to the initiation of biological and non-biological antirheumatic therapies in clinical practice. METHODS:Patients aged 19-60 years initiating non-biological mono (n=2796) or combination disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy (n=973), or biological agents (n=4787) were identified in the Swedish Rheumatology Quality Register between 1999 and 2007. Sick leave and disability pension data (1995-2010) were retrieved from national registers. RESULTS: During the year before the start of mono DMARD, combination DMARD and biological treatment, 10%, 12% and 43% of patients received disability pension benefits, respectively. The corresponding combined annual sick leave and disability pension days were 78 (54+25), 132 (105+27) and 190 (79+111). Irrespective of treatment type, initiators were characterised by a history of increasing sick leave and disability pension. Treatment start was associated with a break in this trajectory: sick leave decreased while disability pension increased, resulting in a net stabilisation of total days. Higher levels of days on sick leave and disability pension at treatment start were observed in patients initiating biologics in 1999 (236 days/year) compared with 2007 (150 days/year; p<0.001), but the trajectory thereafter remained largely similar and contrasted markedly with the level in the general population. CONCLUSION: Sick leave and disability pension increased rapidly before the initiation of antirheumatic therapy, which was associated with a halt but not a reversal of this development. Work ability is a metric of importance for clinical practice, signalling large remaining needs in the RA population, and the need for intervention earlier in the disease process.
Authors: Nancy A Shadick; Nicole M Gerlanc; Michelle L Frits; Bradley S Stolshek; Brenna L Brady; Christine Iannaccone; David Collier; Jing Cui; Alex Mutebi; Michael E Weinblatt Journal: Clin Rheumatol Date: 2019-07-29 Impact factor: 2.980
Authors: Maria de la Vega; Hellen M da Silveira de Carvalho; Lucio Ventura Ríos; Maria V Goycochea Robles; Gustavo C Casado Journal: Rheumatol Int Date: 2012-12-23 Impact factor: 2.631
Authors: Adrian Levitsky; Kerstin Brismar; Ingiäld Hafström; Karen Hambardzumyan; Cecilia Lourdudoss; Ronald F van Vollenhoven; Saedis Saevarsdottir Journal: RMD Open Date: 2017-08-09
Authors: Lotte Heimans; Kirsten V C Wevers-de Boer; K K Michel Koudijs; Karen Visser; Yvonne P Goekoop-Ruiterman; Joop B Harbers; Gerda M Steup-Beekman; Leroy R Lard; Bernard A M Grillet; Tom W J Huizinga; Cornelia F Allaart Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2013-10-31 Impact factor: 5.156
Authors: Marian H van Beers-Tas; Marieke M Ter Wee; Lilian H van Tuyl; Bertha Maat; Wijnanda Hoogland; Aase H Hensvold; Anca I Catrina; Erika Mosor; Tanja A Stamm; Axel Finckh; Delphine S Courvoisier; Andrew Filer; Ilfita Sahbudin; Rebecca J Stack; Karim Raza; Dirkjan van Schaardenburg Journal: RMD Open Date: 2018-05-21