Literature DB >> 21518662

A level set method for image segmentation in the presence of intensity inhomogeneities with application to MRI.

Chunming Li1, Rui Huang, Zhaohua Ding, J Chris Gatenby, Dimitris N Metaxas, John C Gore.   

Abstract

Intensity inhomogeneity often occurs in real-world images, which presents a considerable challenge in image segmentation. The most widely used image segmentation algorithms are region-based and typically rely on the homogeneity of the image intensities in the regions of interest, which often fail to provide accurate segmentation results due to the intensity inhomogeneity. This paper proposes a novel region-based method for image segmentation, which is able to deal with intensity inhomogeneities in the segmentation. First, based on the model of images with intensity inhomogeneities, we derive a local intensity clustering property of the image intensities, and define a local clustering criterion function for the image intensities in a neighborhood of each point. This local clustering criterion function is then integrated with respect to the neighborhood center to give a global criterion of image segmentation. In a level set formulation, this criterion defines an energy in terms of the level set functions that represent a partition of the image domain and a bias field that accounts for the intensity inhomogeneity of the image. Therefore, by minimizing this energy, our method is able to simultaneously segment the image and estimate the bias field, and the estimated bias field can be used for intensity inhomogeneity correction (or bias correction). Our method has been validated on synthetic images and real images of various modalities, with desirable performance in the presence of intensity inhomogeneities. Experiments show that our method is more robust to initialization, faster and more accurate than the well-known piecewise smooth model. As an application, our method has been used for segmentation and bias correction of magnetic resonance (MR) images with promising results.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 21518662     DOI: 10.1109/TIP.2011.2146190

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process        ISSN: 1057-7149            Impact factor:   10.856


  94 in total

1.  Comparative performance evaluation of automated segmentation methods of hippocampus from magnetic resonance images of temporal lobe epilepsy patients.

Authors:  Mohammad-Parsa Hosseini; Mohammad-Reza Nazem-Zadeh; Dario Pompili; Kourosh Jafari-Khouzani; Kost Elisevich; Hamid Soltanian-Zadeh
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 2.  Principles and methods for automatic and semi-automatic tissue segmentation in MRI data.

Authors:  Lei Wang; Teodora Chitiboi; Hans Meine; Matthias Günther; Horst K Hahn
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  Automated quantification of lung structures from optical coherence tomography images.

Authors:  Alex M Pagnozzi; Rodney W Kirk; Brendan F Kennedy; David D Sampson; Robert A McLaughlin
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 3.732

4.  Adaptive local window for level set segmentation of CT and MRI liver lesions.

Authors:  Assaf Hoogi; Christopher F Beaulieu; Guilherme M Cunha; Elhamy Heba; Claude B Sirlin; Sandy Napel; Daniel L Rubin
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 8.545

5.  Liver Ultrasound Image Segmentation Using Region-Difference Filters.

Authors:  Nishant Jain; Vinod Kumar
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  [A fast adaptive active contour model based on local gray difference for parotid duct].

Authors:  Xuan Deng; Tianjun Lan; Minghui Zhang; Zhifeng Chen; Qian Tao; Zhentai Lu
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2018-12-30

7.  Multiatlas approach with local registration goodness weighting for MRI-based electron density mapping of head and neck anatomy.

Authors:  Reza Farjam; Neelam Tyagi; Harini Veeraraghavan; Aditya Apte; Kristen Zakian; Margie A Hunt; Joseph O Deasy
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Sex-specific alterations in preterm brain.

Authors:  Amanda Benavides; Andrew Metzger; Alexander Tereshchenko; Amy Conrad; Edward F Bell; John Spencer; Shannon Ross-Sheehy; Michael Georgieff; Vince Magnotta; Peg Nopoulos
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 3.756

9.  Levels Propagation Approach to Image Segmentation: Application to Breast MR Images.

Authors:  Fatah Bouchebbah; Hachem Slimani
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.056

10.  Visual saliency-based active learning for prostate magnetic resonance imaging segmentation.

Authors:  Dwarikanath Mahapatra; Joachim M Buhmann
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2016-02-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.