Literature DB >> 21517747

Robotic assisted surgery in gynecology: current insights and future perspectives.

Andrea Tinelli1, Antonio Malvasi, Sarah Gustapane, Maurizio Buscarini, Indy S Gill, Michael Stark, Farr R Nezhat, Liselotte Mettler.   

Abstract

To focus on the recent adoption, patents, experience, and future of Robotic assisted surgery (RAS) applications in gynecologic surgery, a computer aided and manual search for clinical and systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, prospective observational studies, retrospective studies and case reports published between 1970 and January of 2011 has been performed. The use of RAS in gynecologic patients includes hysterectomy, myomectomy, tubal reanastomoses, radical hysterectomy, lymph node dissection, and sacrocolpopexies. Although individual studies vary, gynecological RAS is often associated with longer operating room time but similar clinical outcomes, decreased blood loss, and shorter hospital stay. RAS procedures on women have, however, their own limitations: the patented equipment is very large, bulky, and expensive, the staff must be trained specifically on draping and docking the instruments, the lack of surgical haptic feedback, a limited vaginal access, a limited specific instrumentation, and the need for larger port incisions requiring fascial closure. The RAS significantly facilitates gynecologic surgery, even if well-designed, prospective studies are needed to fully assess the value of this equipments in particular studies with well-defined clinical and long-term outcomes, including complications, cost, pain, return to normal activity, and quality of life. The future of robotic surgery in gynecology may be bright, but currently, caution is advisable and clinically meaningful long-term outcomes are needed. These recent patents, however, has exciting potential for future applications, especially in long-distance telesurgery and might change the paradigm of gynecologic surgery in the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21517747     DOI: 10.2174/187220811795655913

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Recent Pat Biotechnol        ISSN: 1872-2083


  5 in total

1.  Robot-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: two cases.

Authors:  Pierre Collinet; Manuel Ascencio; Jean-Philippe Lucot; Michel Cosson
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2012-10-25

Review 2.  Robotic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy in the treatment of gastric cancer.

Authors:  Yafan Yang; Guiying Wang; Jingli He; Fengpeng Wu; Shuguang Ren
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 4.553

3.  Robotic surgery in gynecology: an updated systematic review.

Authors:  Lori Weinberg; Sanjay Rao; Pedro F Escobar
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2011-11-28

4.  Postoperative outcomes after robotic versus abdominal myomectomy.

Authors:  Leanne Griffin; Joe Feinglass; Ariane Garrett; Anne Henson; Leeber Cohen; Angela Chaudhari; Alexander Lin
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2013 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

5.  Robotic versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Guixiang Liao; Jiarong Chen; Chen Ren; Rong Li; Shasha Du; Guozhu Xie; Haijun Deng; Kaijun Yang; Yawei Yuan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.