BACKGROUND: Warning labels on tobacco products provide an effective way of communicating the consequences of tobacco use. Research has shown that larger and colorful warnings placed on packaging are more effective for informing consumers and general public. However, primarily due to powerful lobbying by the industry, pictorial health warnings in India experienced constant delay in introduction and dilution of content. The current warnings appearing on tobacco products consist of drawing of a scorpion on smokeless forms of tobacco and pictures and X- rays of diseased lungs for smoking forms. METHODOLOGY: To understand people's attitude towards the pictorial warning and their understanding of the pictures, a study was planned in two phases. The first phase was qualitative with focus group discussion and second, a population based survey for validating the findings. RESULTS: The findings of the study suggested that the mandated pictorial warnings do not serve the desired purpose since they are not properly understood. The scorpion becomes associated with the product in a non-scientific manner. X-rays of lung are hardly understood by anybody and pictures of diseased lungs are not used by tobacco manufacturers. CONCLUSION: The results of both the focus group discussions and the field survey indicate that most people have seen text and pictorial warnings on smokeless and smoking tobacco products, but that they lack relevance to the text messages. Irrespective of education the early proposed pictorial warnings by the government were more effective than the currently implemented warnings. People would like to see the warnings mainly in Hindi and Marathi (local language) and want them to be placed on the top or middle of both sides of tobacco packaging.
BACKGROUND: Warning labels on tobacco products provide an effective way of communicating the consequences of tobacco use. Research has shown that larger and colorful warnings placed on packaging are more effective for informing consumers and general public. However, primarily due to powerful lobbying by the industry, pictorial health warnings in India experienced constant delay in introduction and dilution of content. The current warnings appearing on tobacco products consist of drawing of a scorpion on smokeless forms of tobacco and pictures and X- rays of diseased lungs for smoking forms. METHODOLOGY: To understand people's attitude towards the pictorial warning and their understanding of the pictures, a study was planned in two phases. The first phase was qualitative with focus group discussion and second, a population based survey for validating the findings. RESULTS: The findings of the study suggested that the mandated pictorial warnings do not serve the desired purpose since they are not properly understood. The scorpion becomes associated with the product in a non-scientific manner. X-rays of lung are hardly understood by anybody and pictures of diseased lungs are not used by tobacco manufacturers. CONCLUSION: The results of both the focus group discussions and the field survey indicate that most people have seen text and pictorial warnings on smokeless and smoking tobacco products, but that they lack relevance to the text messages. Irrespective of education the early proposed pictorial warnings by the government were more effective than the currently implemented warnings. People would like to see the warnings mainly in Hindi and Marathi (local language) and want them to be placed on the top or middle of both sides of tobacco packaging.
Authors: Seema Mutti-Packer; Jessica L Reid; James F Thrasher; Daniel Romer; Geoffrey T Fong; Prakash C Gupta; Mangesh S Pednekar; Nigar Nargis; David Hammond Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2017-04-04 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Genevieve C Sansone; Lalit J Raute; Geoffrey T Fong; Mangesh S Pednekar; Anne C K Quah; Maansi Bansal-Travers; Prakash C Gupta; Dhirendra N Sinha Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2012-02-15 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: V Parishi Majmudar; A Gauravi Mishra; V Sheetal Kulkarni; R Rohit Dusane; S Surendra Shastri Journal: Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol Date: 2015 Jan-Mar
Authors: Shannon Gravely; Geoffrey T Fong; Pete Driezen; Steve Xu; Anne C K Quah; Genevieve Sansone; Prakash C Gupta; Mangesh S Pednekar Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2016-12-13 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Jessica L Reid; Seema Mutti-Packer; Prakash C Gupta; Qiang Li; Jiang Yuan; Nigar Nargis; A K M Ghulam Hussain; David Hammond Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2017-08-02 Impact factor: 3.390