Literature DB >> 21517205

The arbitrariness of the sign: learning advantages from the structure of the vocabulary.

Padraic Monaghan1, Morten H Christiansen, Stanka A Fitneva.   

Abstract

Recent research has demonstrated that systematic mappings between phonological word forms and their meanings can facilitate language learning (e.g., in the form of sound symbolism or cues to grammatical categories). Yet, paradoxically from a learning viewpoint, most words have an arbitrary form-meaning mapping. We hypothesized that this paradox may reflect a division of labor between 2 different language learning functions: arbitrariness facilitates learning specific word meanings and systematicity facilitates learning to group words into categories. In a series of computational investigations and artificial language learning studies, we varied the extent to which the language was arbitrary or systematic. For both the simulations and the behavioral studies, we found that the optimal structure of the vocabulary for learning incorporated this division of labor. Corpus analyses of English and French indicate that these predicted patterns are also found in natural languages.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21517205     DOI: 10.1037/a0022924

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  23 in total

1.  How arbitrary is language?

Authors:  Padraic Monaghan; Richard C Shillcock; Morten H Christiansen; Simon Kirby
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  The sound symbolism bootstrapping hypothesis for language acquisition and language evolution.

Authors:  Mutsumi Imai; Sotaro Kita
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Sound-meaning association biases evidenced across thousands of languages.

Authors:  Damián E Blasi; Søren Wichmann; Harald Hammarström; Peter F Stadler; Morten H Christiansen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Five mechanisms of sound symbolic association.

Authors:  David M Sidhu; Penny M Pexman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-10

5.  Learning novel phonological neighbors: Syntactic category matters.

Authors:  Isabelle Dautriche; Daniel Swingley; Anne Christophe
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2015-06-24

6.  The Specificity of Sound Symbolic Correspondences in Spoken Language.

Authors:  Christina Y Tzeng; Lynne C Nygaard; Laura L Namy
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-12-29

7.  Arbitrary symbolism in natural language revisited: when word forms carry meaning.

Authors:  Jamie Reilly; Chris Westbury; Jacob Kean; Jonathan E Peelle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-06       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Not just form, not just meaning: Words with consistent form-meaning mappings are learned earlier.

Authors:  Giovanni Cassani; Niklas Limacher
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 2.138

Review 9.  Iconicity in the lab: a review of behavioral, developmental, and neuroimaging research into sound-symbolism.

Authors:  Gwilym Lockwood; Mark Dingemanse
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-08-24

10.  Extracting salient sublexical units from written texts: "Emophon," a corpus-based approach to phonological iconicity.

Authors:  Arash Aryani; Arthur M Jacobs; Markus Conrad
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-10-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.