Literature DB >> 21516884

Does plant diversity benefit agroecosystems? A synthetic review.

Deborah K Letourneau1, Inge Armbrecht, Beatriz Salguero Rivera, James Montoya Lerma, Elizabeth Jiménez Carmona, Martha Constanza Daza, Selene Escobar, Victor Galindo, Catalina Gutiérrez, Sebastián Duque López, Jessica López Mejía, Aleyda Maritza Acosta Rangel, Janine Herrera Rangel, Leonardo Rivera, Carlos Arturo Saavedra, Alba Marina Torres, Aldemar Reyes Trujillo.   

Abstract

Predictive theory on how plant diversity promotes herbivore suppression through movement patterns, host associations, and predation promises a potential alternative to pesticide-intensive monoculture crop production. We used meta-analysis on 552 experiments in 45 articles published over the last 10 years to test if plant diversification schemes reduce herbivores and/or increase the natural enemies of herbivores as predicted by associational resistance hypotheses, the enemies hypothesis, and attraction and repellency model applications in agriculture. We found extensive support for these models with intercropping schemes, inclusion of flowering plants, and use of plants that repel herbivores or attract them away from the crop. Overall, herbivore suppression, enemy enhancement, and crop damage suppression effects were significantly stronger on diversified crops than on crops with none or fewer associated plant species. However, a relatively small, but significantly negative, mean effect size for crop yield indicated that pest-suppressive diversification schemes interfered with production, in part because of reducing densities of the main crop by replacing it with intercrops or non-crop plants. This first use of meta-analysis to evaluate the effects of diversification schemes, a potentially more powerful tool than tallies of significant positive and negative outcomes (vote-counting), revealed stronger overall effects on all parameters measured compared to previous reviews. Our analysis of the same articles used in a recent review facilitates comparisons of vote-counting and meta-analysis, and shows that pronounced results of the meta-analysis are not well explained by a reduction in articles that met its stricter criteria. Rather, compared to outcome counts, effect sizes were rarely neutral (equal to zero), and a mean effect size value for mixed outcomes could be calculated. Problematic statistical properties of vote-counting were avoided with meta-analysis, thus providing a more precise test of the hypotheses. The unambiguous and encouraging results from this meta-analysis of previous research should motivate ecologists to conduct more mechanistic experiments to improve the odds of designing effective crop diversification schemes for improved pest regulation and enhanced crop yield.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21516884     DOI: 10.1890/09-2026.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  85 in total

1.  Oviposition Site Selection Structures Niche Partitioning Among Coccinellid Species in a Tropical Ecosystem.

Authors:  P R Sicsú; R H Macedo; E R Sujii
Journal:  Neotrop Entomol       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 1.434

2.  Associations of wheat with pea can reduce aphid infestations.

Authors:  T Lopes; B Bodson; F Francis
Journal:  Neotrop Entomol       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 1.434

Review 3.  Sustainable intensification in agricultural systems.

Authors:  Jules Pretty; Zareen Pervez Bharucha
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 4.357

4.  Do birds see the forest for the trees? Scale-dependent effects of tree diversity on avian predation of artificial larvae.

Authors:  Evalyne W Muiruri; Kalle Rainio; Julia Koricheva
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Local pesticide use intensity conditions landscape effects on biological pest control.

Authors:  B Ricci; C Lavigne; A Alignier; S Aviron; L Biju-Duval; J C Bouvier; J-P Choisis; P Franck; A Joannon; S Ladet; F Mezerette; M Plantegenest; G Savary; C Thomas; A Vialatte; S Petit
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Mathematical modelling for sustainable aphid control in agriculture via intercropping.

Authors:  Alfonso Allen-Perkins; Ernesto Estrada
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 2.704

7.  Identifying the landscape drivers of agricultural insecticide use leveraging evidence from 100,000 fields.

Authors:  Ashley E Larsen; Frederik Noack
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Tropical tree diversity mediates foraging and predatory effects of insectivorous birds.

Authors:  Colleen S Nell; Luis Abdala-Roberts; Victor Parra-Tabla; Kailen A Mooney
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Driving factors of the communities of phytophagous and predatory mites in a physic nut plantation and spontaneous plants associated.

Authors:  Wilton P Cruz; Renato A Sarmento; Adenir V Teodoro; Marçal P Neto; Maíra Ignacio
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2013-02-17       Impact factor: 2.132

10.  Host-choice reduces, but does not eliminate, the negative effects of a multi-species diet for an herbivorous beetle.

Authors:  William C Wetzel; Jennifer S Thaler
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.