Literature DB >> 21516883

Body condition and pregnancy in northern Yellowstone elk: evidence for predation risk effects?

P J White1, Robert A Garrott, Kenneth L Hamlin, Rachel C Cook, John G Cook, Julie A Cunningham.   

Abstract

S. Creel et al. reported a negative correlation between fecal progesterone concentrations and elk:wolf ratios in greater Yellowstone elk (Cervus elaphus) herds and interpreted this correlation as evidence that pregnancy rates of elk decreased substantially in the presence of wolves (Canis lupus). Apparently, the hypothesized mechanism is that decreased forage intake reduces body condition and either results in elk failing to conceive during the autumn rut or elk losing the fetus during winter. We tested this hypothesis by comparing age-specific body condition (percentage ingesta-free body fat) and pregnancy rates for northern Yellowstone elk, one of the herds sampled by Creel et al., before (1962-1968) and after (2000-2006) wolf restoration using indices developed and calibrated for Rocky Mountain elk. Mean age-adjusted percentage body fat of female elk was similarly high in both periods (9.0%-0.9% pre-wolf; 8.9%-0.8% post-wolf). Estimated pregnancy rates (proportion of females that were pregnant) were 0.91 pre-wolf and 0.87 post-wolf for 4-9 year-old elk (95% CI on difference = -0.15 to 0.03, P = 0.46) and 0.64 pre-wolf and 0.78 post-wolf for elk > 9 years old (95% CI on difference = -0.01 to 0.27, P = 0.06). Thus, there was little evidence in these data to support strong effects of wolf presence on elk pregnancy. We caution that multiple lines of evidence and/or strong validation should be brought to bear before relying on indirect measures of how predators affect pregnancy rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21516883     DOI: 10.1890/09-2123.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  6 in total

1.  Temporal variation in site fidelity: scale-dependent effects of forage abundance and predation risk in a non-migratory large herbivore.

Authors:  F M van Beest; E Vander Wal; A V Stronen; P C Paquet; R K Brook
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Diagnosing predation risk effects on demography: can measuring physiology provide the means?

Authors:  Liana Y Zanette; Michael Clinchy; Justin P Suraci
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Underestimating the frequency, strength and cost of antipredator responses with data from GPS collars: an example with wolves and elk.

Authors:  Scott Creel; John A Winnie; David Christianson
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Ecosystem scale declines in elk recruitment and population growth with wolf colonization: a before-after-control-impact approach.

Authors:  David Christianson; Scott Creel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Hidden cost of disease in a free-ranging ungulate: brucellosis reduces mid-winter pregnancy in elk.

Authors:  Gavin G Cotterill; Paul C Cross; Arthur D Middleton; Jared D Rogerson; Brandon M Scurlock; Johan T du Toit
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-10-28       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Evaluating the summer landscapes of predation risk and forage quality for elk (Cervus canadensis).

Authors:  John Terrill Paterson; Kelly M Proffitt; Nicholas J DeCesare; Justin A Gude; Mark Hebblewhite
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 3.167

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.