Literature DB >> 21516562

Sample size determination in superiority clinical trials with multiple co-primary correlated endpoints.

Takashi Sozu1, Tomoyuki Sugimoto, Toshimitsu Hamasaki.   

Abstract

In pharmaceutical drug development, for regulatory purposes, there are increasing discussions on the establishment of statistically significant results demonstrating the efficacy of a new treatment on multiple co-primary endpoints. At the design stage with multiple co-primary endpoints, it is critical to determine the appropriate sample size for indicating statistical significance for all co-primary endpoints with preserving the intended power set, since the type II error increases as the number of co-primary endpoints increases. We provide fundamental formulae for power and sample size calculation with multiple co-primary endpoints and illustrate the aspect of the provided methods through numerical tables and examples.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21516562     DOI: 10.1080/10543406.2011.551329

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biopharm Stat        ISSN: 1054-3406            Impact factor:   1.051


  9 in total

Review 1.  Design, data monitoring, and analysis of clinical trials with co-primary endpoints: A review.

Authors:  Toshimitsu Hamasaki; Scott R Evans; Koko Asakura
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 1.051

2.  Group-Sequential Strategies in Clinical Trials with Multiple Co-Primary Outcomes.

Authors:  Toshimitsu Hamasaki; Koko Asakura; Scott R Evans; Tomoyuki Sugimoto; Takashi Sozu
Journal:  Stat Biopharm Res       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.452

3.  Sample size determination in group-sequential clinical trials with two co-primary endpoints.

Authors:  Koko Asakura; Toshimitsu Hamasaki; Tomoyuki Sugimoto; Kenichi Hayashi; Scott R Evans; Takashi Sozu
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Sample Size Considerations in Clinical Trials when Comparing Two Interventions using Multiple Co-Primary Binary Relative Risk Contrasts.

Authors:  Yuki Ando; Toshimitsu Hamasaki; Scott R Evans; Koko Asakura; Tomoyuki Sugimoto; Takashi Sozu; Yuko Ohno
Journal:  Stat Biopharm Res       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 1.452

5.  Methodological challenges in pragmatic trials in Alzheimer's disease and related dementias: Opportunities for improvement.

Authors:  Monica Taljaard; Fan Li; Bo Qin; Caroline Cui; Leyi Zhang; Stuart G Nicholls; Kelly Carroll; Susan L Mitchell
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 2.486

Review 6.  Review of pragmatic trials found that multiple primary outcomes are common but so too are discrepancies between protocols and final reports.

Authors:  Pascale Nevins; Shelley Vanderhout; Kelly Carroll; Stuart G Nicholls; Seana N Semchishen; Jamie C Brehaut; Dean A Fergusson; Bruno Giraudeau; Monica Taljaard
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 7.407

7.  Sample size determination for clinical trials with co-primary outcomes: exponential event times.

Authors:  Toshimitsu Hamasaki; Tomoyuki Sugimoto; Scott Evans; Takashi Sozu
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2012-10-19       Impact factor: 1.894

8.  Sample size determination for a specific region in multiregional clinical trials with multiple co-primary endpoints.

Authors:  Wong-Shian Huang; Hui-Nien Hung; Toshimitsu Hamasaki; Chin-Fu Hsiao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Sample size estimation using a latent variable model for mixed outcome co-primary, multiple primary and composite endpoints.

Authors:  Martina E McMenamin; Jessica K Barrett; Anna Berglind; James M S Wason
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 2.497

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.