Literature DB >> 21515876

Moral experience: a framework for bioethics research.

Matthew R Hunt1, Franco A Carnevale.   

Abstract

Theoretical and empirical research in bioethics frequently focuses on ethical dilemmas or problems. This paper draws on anthropological and phenomenological sources to develop an alternative framework for bioethical enquiry that allows examination of a broader range of how the moral is experienced in the everyday lives of individuals and groups. Our account of moral experience is subjective and hermeneutic. We define moral experience as "Encompassing a person's sense that values that he or she deem important are being realised or thwarted in everyday life. This includes a person's interpretations of a lived encounter, or a set of lived encounters, that fall on spectrums of right-wrong, good-bad or just-unjust". In our conceptualisation, moral experience is not limited to situations that are heavily freighted with ethically-troubling ramifications or are sources of debate and disagreement. Important aspects of moral experience are played out in mundane and everyday settings. Moral experience provides a research framework, the scope of which extends beyond the evaluation of ethical dilemmas, processes of moral justification and decision-making, and moral distress. This broad research focus is consistent with views expressed by commentators within and beyond bioethics who have called for deeper and more sustained attention in bioethics scholarship to a wider set of concerns, experiences and issues that better captures what is ethically at stake for individuals and communities. In this paper we present our conceptualisation of moral experience, articulate its epistemological and ontological foundations and discuss opportunities for empirical bioethics research using this framework.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21515876     DOI: 10.1136/jme.2010.039008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  6 in total

1.  Ethics and Community-Based Rehabilitation: Eight Ethical Questions from a Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Stephen Clarke; Jessica Barudin; Matthew Hunt
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.037

2.  Supporting the role of community members employed as research staff: Perspectives of community researchers working in addiction research.

Authors:  Gala True; Leslie B Alexander; Celia B Fisher
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Bioethics Must Exemplify a Clear Path toward Justice: A Call to Action.

Authors:  Faith Fletcher; Shameka Poetry Thomas; Folasade C Lapite; Keisha Ray
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 14.676

Review 4.  Ethical Issues in Research: Perceptions of Researchers, Research Ethics Board Members and Research Ethics Experts.

Authors:  Marie-Josée Drolet; Eugénie Rose-Derouin; Julie-Claude Leblanc; Mélanie Ruest; Bryn Williams-Jones
Journal:  J Acad Ethics       Date:  2022-08-12

5.  Ethical considerations related to participation and partnership: an investigation of stakeholders' perceptions of an action-research project on user fee removal for the poorest in Burkina Faso.

Authors:  Matthew R Hunt; Patrick Gogognon; Valéry Ridde
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 2.652

6.  Perceptions of donors and recipients regarding blood donation.

Authors:  Vander Monteiro da Conceição; Jeferson Santos Araújo; Rafaela Azevedo Abrantes de Oliveira; Mary Elizabeth de Santana; Márcia Maria Fontão Zago
Journal:  Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter       Date:  2016-06-11
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.