Literature DB >> 21515871

Recovery of coordinated gait: randomized controlled stroke trial of functional electrical stimulation (FES) versus no FES, with weight-supported treadmill and over-ground training.

Janis J Daly1, Janice Zimbelman, Kristen L Roenigk, Jessica P McCabe, Jean M Rogers, Kristi Butler, Richard Burdsall, John P Holcomb, E Byron Marsolais, Robert L Ruff.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: No single intervention restores the coordinated components of gait after stroke.
OBJECTIVE: The authors tested the multimodal Gait Training Protocol, with or without functional electrical stimulation (FES), to improve volitional walking (without FES) in patients with persistent (>6 months) dyscoordinated gait.
METHODS: A total of 53 subjects were stratified and randomly allocated to either FES with intramuscular (IM) electrodes (FES-IM) or No-FES. Both groups received 1.5-hour training sessions 4 times a week for 12 weeks of coordination exercises, body weight-supported treadmill training (BWSTT), and over-ground walking, provided with FES-IM or No-FES. The primary outcome was the Gait Assessment and Intervention Tool (G.A.I.T.) of coordinated movement components, with secondary measures, including manual muscle testing, isolated leg movements (Fugl-Meyer scale), 6-Minute Walk Test, and Locomotion/Mobility subscale of the Functional Independence Measure (FIM).
RESULTS: No baseline differences in subject characteristics and measures were found. The G.A.I.T. showed an additive advantage with FES-IM versus No-FES (parameter statistic 1.10; P = .045, 95% CI = 0.023-2.179) at the end of training. For both FES-IM and No-FES, a within-group, pre/posttreatment gain was present for all measures (P < .05), and a continued benefit from mid- to posttreatment (P < .05) was present. For FES-IM, recovered coordinated gait persisted at 6-month follow-up but not for No-FES.
CONCLUSION: Improved gait coordination and function were produced by the multimodal Gait Training Protocol. FES-IM added significant gains that were maintained for 6 months after the completion of training.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21515871     DOI: 10.1177/1545968311400092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair        ISSN: 1545-9683            Impact factor:   3.919


  40 in total

1.  Effects of functional electrical stimulation on gait recovery post-neurological injury during inpatient rehabilitation.

Authors:  Chad I Lairamore; Mark K Garrison; Laetitia Bourgeon; Mark Mennemeier
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  2014-08-25

2.  Brain-computer interface: current and emerging rehabilitation applications.

Authors:  Janis J Daly; Jane E Huggins
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.966

3.  Mobility Function and Recovery After Stroke: Preliminary Insights From Sympathetic Nervous System Activity.

Authors:  Sudeshna A Chatterjee; Janis J Daly; Eric C Porges; Emily J Fox; Dorian K Rose; Theresa E McGuirk; Dana M Otzel; Katie A Butera; David J Clark
Journal:  J Neurol Phys Ther       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.649

4.  Evaluation of high-density, multi-contact nerve cuffs for activation of grasp muscles in monkeys.

Authors:  N A Brill; S N Naufel; K Polasek; C Ethier; J Cheesborough; S Agnew; L E Miller; D J Tyler
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 5.379

5.  Reducing The Cost of Transport and Increasing Walking Distance After Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial on Fast Locomotor Training Combined With Functional Electrical Stimulation.

Authors:  Louis N Awad; Darcy S Reisman; Ryan T Pohlig; Stuart A Binder-Macleod
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 3.919

Review 6.  Brain-controlled muscle stimulation for the restoration of motor function.

Authors:  Christian Ethier; Lee E Miller
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 5.996

7.  Should body weight-supported treadmill training and robotic-assistive steppers for locomotor training trot back to the starting gate?

Authors:  Bruce H Dobkin; Pamela W Duncan
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 3.919

8.  Muscle plasticity and ankle control after repetitive use of a functional electrical stimulation device for foot drop in cerebral palsy.

Authors:  Diane L Damiano; Laura A Prosser; Lindsey A Curatalo; Katharine E Alter
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 3.919

Review 9.  New evidence for therapies in stroke rehabilitation.

Authors:  Bruce H Dobkin; Andrew Dorsch
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 5.113

10.  Contralaterally controlled neuromuscular electrical stimulation for recovery of ankle dorsiflexion: a pilot randomized controlled trial in patients with chronic post-stroke hemiplegia.

Authors:  Jayme S Knutson; Kristine Hansen; Jennifer Nagy; Stephanie N Bailey; Douglas D Gunzler; Lynne R Sheffler; John Chae
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.159

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.