Literature DB >> 21515803

Ethmoid adenocarcinoma--from craniofacial to endoscopic resections: a single-institution experience over 25 years.

Piero Nicolai1, Andrea Bolzoni Villaret, Marco Bottazzoli, Emanuela Rossi, Maria Grazia Valsecchi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To identify factors that influence hospitalization time, complications, and prognosis of patients with ethmoid adenocarcinoma treated with different surgical techniques.
DESIGN: Single-institution retrospective review.
SETTING: Academic tertiary care center. PATIENTS: Sixty-seven patients with ethmoid adenocarcinoma treated from January 1985 to August 2009 were retrospectively evaluated. Surgical treatment included endoscopic resection (n = 12), endoscopic resection with transnasal craniectomy (n = 17), cranioendoscopic resection (n = 9), external approaches limited to the ethmoid (n = 11), and craniofacial resection (n = 18). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A Cox model was adopted to relate time to death to previous treatment, pT category, grade, and surgical technique. The impact of the same variables on hospitalization time and risk of complications was assessed by linear regression and logistic regression, respectively.
RESULTS: The risk of complications increased for pT4a-b lesions (P = .02) and craniofacial resection (P = .01). Hospitalization time increased by 6.3 days for cranioendoscopic resection (P = .03) and by 11.7 days for craniofacial resection (P < .001). Three- and 5-year overall survivals were 68.0% (standard error = 5.8%) and 48.4% (standard error = 6.9%). Three-year survival was 76.62% and 51.81% for previously untreated and treated patients, respectively, and it was 92.98% and 33.33% in patients treated with endoscopic techniques and craniofacial resection, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that previous treatment (hazard ratio of death = 3.9, P = .01) and craniofacial resection (HR = 5.16, P = .05) were mainly associated with survival.
CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic techniques, in properly selected patients, were associated with a favorable oncologic outcome and a statistically significant reduction in both complication rate and hospitalization time. This study supports the role of endoscopic techniques in surgical treatment of ethmoid adenocarcinoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21515803     DOI: 10.1177/0194599811403873

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  11 in total

Review 1.  Comprehensive review on endonasal endoscopic sinus surgery.

Authors:  Rainer K Weber; Werner Hosemann
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-12-22

Review 2.  Endoscopic resection of sinonasal cancers.

Authors:  Shirley Y Su; Michael E Kupferman; Franco DeMonte; Nicholas B Levine; Shaan M Raza; Ehab Y Hanna
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 5.075

3.  Costs and Perioperative Outcomes Associated with Open versus Endoscopic Resection of Sinonasal Malignancies with Skull Base Involvement.

Authors:  Terence S Fu; Eric Monteiro; Ian Witterick; Allan Vescan; Gelareh Zadeh; Fred Gentili; John R de Almeida
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2017-06-30

Review 4.  Sinonasal carcinoma: clinical, pathological, genetic and therapeutic advances.

Authors:  José Luis Llorente; Fernando López; Carlos Suárez; Mario A Hermsen
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 66.675

5.  Comparison of endoscopic and external resections for sinonasal instestinal-type adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Geoffrey Mortuaire; Xavier Leroy; Claire Vandenhende-Szymanski; Dominique Chevalier; Anne-Sophie Thisse
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Radionecrosis of the frontal lobe as a consequence of malignant ethmoid tumor management: incidence, diagnosis, risk factors, prevention and management.

Authors:  N Oker; P Lang; D Bresson; B George; J-P Guichard; M Wassef; E Sauvaget; S Froelich; R Kania; P Herman
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Adenocarcinomas of the sinonasal tract: a case series from an Oncology Centre in Northern Portugal.

Authors:  R Veloso-Teles; I Ribeiro; J Castro-Silva; E Monteiro
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Audit of Complications in an Otolaryngology Led Skull-Base Surgical Practice.

Authors:  Uma Patnaik; Smriti Panda; Alok Thakar
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2018-12-26

9.  Chondroid chordoma and nasal adenocarcinoma: an exceptional association.

Authors:  Patrice Gallet; Nathalie Marcon; Thomas Georgel; Jean-Marie Vignaud; Cécile Parietti-Winkler; Roger Jankowski
Journal:  Case Rep Oncol Med       Date:  2012-09-17

10.  Intracerebral bullet removal through an endoscopic transnasal craniectomy.

Authors:  Andrea Bolzoni Villaret; Francesco Zenga; Isabella Esposito; Frank Rasulo; Marco Fontanella; Piero Nicolai
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2012-12-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.