Literature DB >> 21515508

A population-based study of dystrophin mutations in Canada.

Jean K Mah1, Kathryn Selby, Craig Campbell, Amelie Nadeau, Mark Tarnopolsky, Anna McCormick, Joseph M Dooley, Hanna Kolski, Andrew J Skalsky, R Garth Smith, David Buckley, Peter N Ray, Grace Yoon.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: We carried out a population-based study of dystrophin mutations in patients followed by members of the Canadian Paediatric Neuromuscular Group (CPNG) over a ten-year period.
OBJECTIVES: We aimed to describe the changes in diagnostic testing for dystrophinopathy and to determine the frequency of dystrophin mutations from 2000 to 2009.
METHODS: De-identified data containing the clinical phenotypes, diagnostic methods, and mutational reports from dystrophinopathy patients followed by CPNG centres from January 2000 to December 2009 were analyzed using descriptive statistics.
RESULTS: 773 patients had a confirmed diagnosis of dystrophinopathy based on genetic testing (97%), muscle biopsy (2%), or family history (1%). 573 (74%) had complete deletion/duplication analysis of all 79 exons or whole gene sequencing, resulting in 366 (64%) deletions, 64 (11%) duplications, and 143 (25%) point mutations. The percentage of patients who were diagnosed using currently accepted genetic testing methods varied across Canada, with a mean of 63% (SD 23). 246 (43%) mutations involved exons 45 to 53. The top ten deletions (n=147, 26%) were exons 45-47, 45-48, 45, 45-50, 45-55, 51, 45-49, 45-52, 49-50, and 46-47. 169 (29%) mutations involved exons 2 to 20. The most common duplications (n=29, 5.1%) were exons 2, 2-7, 2-17, 3-7, 8-11, 10, 10-11, and 12.
CONCLUSION: This is the most comprehensive report of dystrophin mutations in Canada. Consensus guidelines regarding the diagnostic approach to dystrophinopathy will hopefully reduce the geographical variation in mutation detection rates in the coming decade.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21515508     DOI: 10.1017/s0317167100011896

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Neurol Sci        ISSN: 0317-1671            Impact factor:   2.104


  15 in total

1.  Clinical Utility Gene Card for: Becker muscular dystrophy.

Authors:  David Coote; Mark R Davis; Macarena Cabrera; Merrilee Needham; Nigel G Laing; Kristen J Nowak
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Analysis of dystrophin gene in Iranian Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophies patients and identification of a novel mutation.

Authors:  Gholam Reza Zamani; Fatemeh Karami; Mahshid Mehdizadeh; Abolfazl Movafagh; Yalda Nilipour; Mahdi Zamani
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 3.307

3.  Molecular characterization and reclassification of a 1.18 Mbp DMD duplication following positive carrier screening for Duchenne/Becker muscular dystrophy.

Authors:  Cinthya J Zepeda-Mendoza; Jordan E Bontrager; Camille F Fisher; Amber McDonald; Jaya K George-Abraham; Linda Hasadsri
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2022-07-11

4.  CUGC for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD).

Authors:  David J Coote; Mark R Davis; Macarena Cabrera; Merrilee Needham; Nigel G Laing; Kristen J Nowak
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 5.  Current and Emerging Therapies for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.

Authors:  Megan Crone; Jean K Mah
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2018-06-23       Impact factor: 3.598

6.  Comparative Genomics of X-linked Muscular Dystrophies: The Golden Retriever Model.

Authors:  Candice Brinkmeyer-Langford; Joe N Kornegay
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.236

7.  Genetic diagnosis of Duchenne/Becker muscular dystrophy using next-generation sequencing: validation analysis of DMD mutations.

Authors:  Mariko Okubo; Narihiro Minami; Kanako Goto; Yuichi Goto; Satoru Noguchi; Satomi Mitsuhashi; Ichizo Nishino
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 3.172

Review 8.  The burden, epidemiology, costs and treatment for Duchenne muscular dystrophy: an evidence review.

Authors:  S Ryder; R M Leadley; N Armstrong; M Westwood; S de Kock; T Butt; M Jain; J Kleijnen
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 4.123

Review 9.  Global epidemiology of Duchenne muscular dystrophy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Salvatore Crisafulli; Janet Sultana; Andrea Fontana; Francesco Salvo; Sonia Messina; Gianluca Trifirò
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 4.123

Review 10.  Current and emerging treatment strategies for Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

Authors:  Jean K Mah
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 2.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.