Literature DB >> 21514913

Objective assessment of change in apparent age after facial rejuvenation surgery.

Eric Swanson1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Facial "rejuvenation" procedures make an implicit claim to provide a more youthful appearance. However, any benefit from such procedures has not been objectively evaluated and validated. This study was undertaken to investigate the effectiveness of facial rejuvenation using a deep-plane facelift and other cosmetic procedures.
METHODS: Seventy-five patients were included in the study - 71 consecutive patients who met the study criteria and four controls. Inclusion criteria included at least 6 months' follow-up, standardized photos with no makeup or jewelry, and no subsequent cosmetic procedures. Simultaneous procedures included submental lipectomy, fat injection, laser skin resurfacing, blepharoplasty, endoscopic forehead lift, and chin/jowl augmentation. Photographs were judged by 198 independent members of the public who were asked to rate apparent age.
RESULTS: The mean reduction in apparent age for all surgical patients was 6.0 years (range 0.8-14.2 years) versus no change for the control patients (p < 0.01). The average reduction in apparent age after a facelift alone was 4.6 years. Laser resurfacing provided 2.5 years of apparent age reduction (p < 0.05). Eyelid surgery and an endoscopic forehead lift each contributed a 2-year reduction in apparent age (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference when patients were compared by gender, age, body mass index, or facial shape.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide the first objective evidence that cosmetic surgery (or any intervention, surgical or otherwise) is effective in providing a more youthful appearance. Facelift, laser resurfacing, blepharoplasty, and endoscopic forehead lift all significantly contribute to a reduction in apparent age.
Copyright © 2011 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21514913     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2011.04.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg        ISSN: 1748-6815            Impact factor:   2.740


  8 in total

1.  Influence of premolar extractions on long-term adult facial aesthetics and apparent age.

Authors:  Guilherme Janson; Cintia Helena Zingaretti Junqueira; Lucas Marzullo Mendes; Daniela Gamba Garib
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Association Between Facial Rejuvenation and Observer Ratings of Youth, Attractiveness, Success, and Health.

Authors:  Kristin L Bater; Lisa E Ishii; Ira D Papel; Theda C Kontis; Patrick J Byrne; Kofi D O Boahene; Jason C Nellis; Masaru Ishii
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 4.611

3.  Efficacy of Laser Resurfacing and Facial Plastic Surgery Using Age, Glogau, and Fitzpatrick Rating.

Authors:  Jose Enrique Barrera; Michael Julian Adame; Josh A Lospinoso; Thomas M Beachkofsky
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-10-02

4.  Clinical Evaluation of 225 Sub-SMAS Facelifts with No Temporal Incision.

Authors:  Eric Swanson
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-02-26

5.  Photographic Comparison of Malar Projection in 100 Facelift Patients Treated with and without Fat Injection.

Authors:  Eric Swanson
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-10-22

6.  Association of Face-lift Surgery With Social Perception, Age, Attractiveness, Health, and Success.

Authors:  Jason C Nellis; Masaru Ishii; Ira D Papel; Theda C Kontis; Patrick J Byrne; Kofi D O Boahene; Kristin L Bater; Lisa E Ishii
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 4.611

7.  A Dual Approach to Understanding Facial Perception Before and After Blepharoplasty.

Authors:  Kristin L Bater; Masaru Ishii; Jason C Nellis; Andrew Joseph; Ira D Papel; Theda C Kontis; Patrick J Byrne; Kofi D O Boahene; Lisa E Ishii
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 4.611

8.  Aspects of facial contrast decrease with age and are cues for age perception.

Authors:  Aurélie Porcheron; Emmanuelle Mauger; Richard Russell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.