Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are important factors in gliomas since these enzymes facilitate invasion into the surrounding brain and participate in neovascularization. In particular, the gelatinases (MMP-2 and MMP-9), and more recently MMP-25, have been shown to be highly expressed in gliomas and have been associated with disease progression. Thus, inhibition of these MMPs may represent a promising non-cytotoxic approach to glioma treatment. We report herein the synthesis and biological evaluation of a series of 4-butylphenyl(ethynylthiophene)sulfonamido-based hydroxamates. Among the new compounds tested, a promising derivative, 5a, was identified, which exhibits nanomolar inhibition of MMP-2, MMP-9, and MMP-25, but weak inhibitory activity toward other members of the MMP family. This compound also exhibited anti-invasive activity of U87MG glioblastoma cells at nanomolar concentrations, without affecting cell viability.
Matrix metalloproteinases (n class="Gene">MMPs) are important factors in gliomassince these enzymes facilitate invasion into the surrounding brain and participate in neovascularization. In particular, the gelatinases (MMP-2 and MMP-9), and more recently MMP-25, have been shown to be highly expressed in gliomas and have been associated with disease progression. Thus, inhibition of these MMPs may represent a promising non-cytotoxic approach to glioma treatment. We report herein the synthesis and biological evaluation of a series of 4-butylphenyl(ethynylthiophene)sulfonamido-based hydroxamates. Among the new compounds tested, a promising derivative, 5a, was identified, which exhibits nanomolar inhibition of MMP-2, MMP-9, and MMP-25, but weak inhibitory activity toward other members of the MMP family. This compound also exhibited anti-invasive activity of U87MGglioblastoma cells at nanomolar concentrations, without affecting cell viability.
Authors: Richard A Friesner; Jay L Banks; Robert B Murphy; Thomas A Halgren; Jasna J Klicic; Daniel T Mainz; Matthew P Repasky; Eric H Knoll; Mee Shelley; Jason K Perry; David E Shaw; Perry Francis; Peter S Shenkin Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2004-03-25 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: G Velasco; S Cal; A Merlos-Suárez; A A Ferrando; S Alvarez; A Nakano; J Arribas; C López-Otín Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2000-02-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Richard A Friesner; Robert B Murphy; Matthew P Repasky; Leah L Frye; Jeremy R Greenwood; Thomas A Halgren; Paul C Sanschagrin; Daniel T Mainz Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2006-10-19 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: P A Forsyth; H Wong; T D Laing; N B Rewcastle; D G Morris; H Muzik; K J Leco; R N Johnston; P M Brasher; G Sutherland; D R Edwards Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 1999-04 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Walter J Akers; Baogang Xu; Hyeran Lee; Gail P Sudlow; Gregg B Fields; Samuel Achilefu; W Barry Edwards Journal: Bioconjug Chem Date: 2012-02-29 Impact factor: 4.774
Authors: Yunfei Wang; Ryan L Stowe; Christie E Pinello; Guimei Tian; Franck Madoux; Dawei Li; Lisa Y Zhao; Jian-Liang Li; Yuren Wang; Yuan Wang; Haiching Ma; Peter Hodder; William R Roush; Daiqing Liao Journal: Chem Biol Date: 2015-02-19
Authors: Jeffrey K Weber; Joseph A Morrone; Sugato Bagchi; Jan D Estrada Pabon; Seung-Gu Kang; Leili Zhang; Wendy D Cornell Journal: J Comput Aided Mol Des Date: 2021-11-24 Impact factor: 4.179