Literature DB >> 21514535

[Flexible ureteroscopy in the treatment of kidney stone between 2 and 3 cm].

M A Ben Saddik1, S Al-Qahtani Sejiny, M Ndoye, S Gil-Diez-de-Medina, B Merlet, A Thomas, F Haab, O Traxer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Our aim was to evaluate the outcome of flexible ureteroscopy (F-URS) with Holmium Laser as a minimal invasive procedure for kidney stone between 2 and 3 cm in diameter. MATERIAL: We prospectively evaluated 101 patients (103 kidney units) with kidney stone between 2 and 3 cm, who underwent flexible ureteroscopy (F-URS) with Holmium Laser. Patient age, sex, body mass index (BMI), stone size, stone composition, associated lower calyx stone, prestenting, congenital abnormalities, urological history, operating time and complications were evaluated. The outcome was determined at 4 weeks on plain radiograph (KUB) and noncontrast CT scan (NCCT) or by endoscopic second look if needed. Ureteroscopy success rate was defined as stone free (SF) or remaining fragments (RF) less than 3 mm.
RESULTS: After F-URS session we obtained a stone free status in 35 kidney units (34%), residual fragment less than 3mm in 30 kidney units (29.1%) and 38 kidney units (36.9%) with significant residual fragment. F-URS success rate was 89.3% and 97.1% after second and third session, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: F-URS with Holmium Laser is a very effective and safe technique in treating kidney stone. This technique should be proposed to patient with kidney stone between 2 and 3 cm as one of the treatment modalities, F-URS offers excellent results, low rate of complications and short hospital stay. Patients should be informed about staged therapy.
Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21514535     DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2010.07.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Urol        ISSN: 1166-7087            Impact factor:   0.915


  6 in total

1.  Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an alternative to retrograde intrarenal surgery and shockwave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Stephan Kruck; Aristoteles G Anastasiadis; Thomas R W Herrmann; Ute Walcher; Mohamed F Abdelhafez; André P Nicklas; Lillian Hölzle; David Schilling; Jens Bedke; Arnulf Stenzl; Udo Nagele
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  The glue-clot technique: a new technique description for small calyceal stone fragments removal.

Authors:  J Cloutier; E R Cordeiro; G M Kamphuis; L Villa; J Letendre; J J de la Rosette; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Impact of Residual Fragments following Endourological Treatments in Renal Stones.

Authors:  Cenk Acar; Cag Cal
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2012-07-05

4.  Early experience of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Renal stone: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study.

Authors:  Robin Joshi
Journal:  JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 0.406

5.  [Flexible laser ureteroscopy in the treatment of upper urinary tract stones: results about 166 interventions].

Authors:  Essodina Padja; Venceslas Amboulou Ibarra; Khalid Lmezguidi; Abdellatif Janane; Mohamed Ghadouane; Ahmed Ameur; Mohamed Abbar
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2015-09-08

6.  Safety and efficacy of retrograde intrarenal surgery for the treatment of renal stone in solitary kidney patients.

Authors:  Dehui Lai; Meiling Chen; Yongzhong He; Xun Li; Shawpong Wan
Journal:  Ren Fail       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.606

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.