Literature DB >> 21514526

Contemporary comparison of surgical and interventional arteriography management of blunt renal injury.

Babak Sarani1, Elizabeth Powell, Joseph Taddeo, Brendan Carr, Aalpen Patel, Mark Seamon, Jessica Wobb, Carrie Sims, Jose Pascual, C William Schwab.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: High-grade renal injuries have traditionally been treated operatively. Alternatively, embolotherapy is used to control hemorrhage, but there are few studies that validate this practice after renal injury. Embolotherapy may offer an effective and safe means to arrest hemorrhage after high-grade blunt renal injury.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis was performed of high-grade renal injury (grade III or higher). Patients who were initially treated with arteriography were compared with those who underwent surgery. Statistical analysis was performed with Wilcoxon rank-sum and χ(2) tests.
RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients were identified, 28 of whom had contrast agent extravasation on computed tomography (CT). Of these 69 patients, 17 underwent operation and 20 underwent arteriography. The surgical cohort had a higher injury severity score (39.6 vs 24.2; P < .01), but there was no difference in renal injury grade (P = .9). The arteriography cohort received significantly more contrast medium (P < .001). Contrast agent extravasation was confirmed angiographically in six of 12 patients who had this finding on CT, and embolotherapy controlled bleeding in all six. No significant difference was noted in transfusion need, recurrent hemorrhage, creatinine level at discharge, glomerular filtration rate, or length of stay (P > .4 for each endpoint). There was a trend toward a longer stay in the intensive care unit in the surgical cohort and a higher likelihood of discharge to home in the arteriography group (P = .08 for each endpoint).
CONCLUSIONS: Embolotherapy offers a safe means to diagnose and arrest hemorrhage after renal injury. The additional contrast agent needed for imaging does not increase the incidence of nephropathy irrespective of renal injury grade.
Copyright © 2011 SIR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21514526     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2011.01.444

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1051-0443            Impact factor:   3.464


  5 in total

1.  Traumatically shattered kidney without urine extravasation or vascular amputation.

Authors:  Johann Jakob Wendler; Julian Jürgens; Martin Schostak; Uwe-Bernd Liehr
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2015-03-05

2.  The effect of transarterial embolization versus nephrectomy on acute kidney injury in blunt renal trauma patients.

Authors:  Chih-Po Hsu; Chi-Tung Cheng; Jen-Fu Huang; Chih-Yuan Fu; Francesco Bajani; Marissa Bokhari; Justin Mis; Stathis Poulakidas; Faran Bokhari
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Renal injury management in an urban trauma centre and implications for urological training.

Authors:  M McPhee; N Arumainayagam; M Clark; N Burfitt; R DasGupta
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  What's new in urological trauma? 2012 update.

Authors:  Benjamin N Breyer; Jack W McAninch
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2012-03

Review 5.  Kidney and uro-trauma: WSES-AAST guidelines.

Authors:  Federico Coccolini; Ernest E Moore; Yoram Kluger; Walter Biffl; Ari Leppaniemi; Yosuke Matsumura; Fernando Kim; Andrew B Peitzman; Gustavo P Fraga; Massimo Sartelli; Luca Ansaloni; Goran Augustin; Andrew Kirkpatrick; Fikri Abu-Zidan; Imitiaz Wani; Dieter Weber; Emmanouil Pikoulis; Martha Larrea; Catherine Arvieux; Vassil Manchev; Viktor Reva; Raul Coimbra; Vladimir Khokha; Alain Chichom Mefire; Carlos Ordonez; Massimo Chiarugi; Fernando Machado; Boris Sakakushev; Junichi Matsumoto; Ron Maier; Isidoro di Carlo; Fausto Catena
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 5.469

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.