Literature DB >> 21514040

The RENAL nephrometry nomogram: statistically significant, but is it clinically relevant?

Brian F Chapin, Christopher G Wood.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2011        PMID： 21514040     DOI： 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.04.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN： 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

Review 1.  Laparascopic nephrectomy: different techniques and approaches.

Authors:  Tania González León
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  External validation of the RENAL nephrometry score nomogram for predicting high-grade renal cell carcinoma in solid, enhancing, and small renal masses.

Authors:  Kyo Chul Koo; Hanna Yoo; Tae Young Shin; Jongchan Kim; Young Deuk Choi; Koon Ho Rha; Won Sik Ham
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-09-07       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  The use of nephrometry scoring systems can help urologists predict the risk of conversion to radical nephrectomy in patients scheduled for partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  Vincenzo Ficarra; Marta Rossanese; Gianluca Giannarini; Alessandro Crestani; Alchiede Simonato; Antonino Inferrera
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-09

4.  A simplified new-generation renal mass complexity scoring system.

Authors:  Ali Hajiran; Ahmet M Aydin; Salim K Cheriyan; Wade J Sexton
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-09

5.  Computer-Generated R.E.N.A.L. Nephrometry Scores Yield Comparable Predictive Results to Those of Human-Expert Scores in Predicting Oncologic and Perioperative Outcomes.

Authors:  N Heller; R Tejpaul; F Isensee; T Benidir; M Hofmann; P Blake; Z Rengal; K Moore; N Sathianathen; A Kalapara; J Rosenberg; S Peterson; E Walczak; A Kutikov; R G Uzzo; D A Palacios; E M Remer; S C Campbell; N Papanikolopoulos; Christopher J Weight
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2021-12-30       Impact factor: 7.600
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.