Literature DB >> 21514008

Influence of tracheal suctioning systems on health care workers' gloves and equipment contamination: a comparison of closed and open systems.

Jean-Damien Ricard1, Matthieu Eveillard, Yolaine Martin, Guilène Barnaud, Catherine Branger, Didier Dreyfuss.   

Abstract

The impact of tracheal suctioning with an open or a closed system on equipment and health care workers contamination with multidrug-resistant pathogens was compared. Only the closed system reduced hand and equipment contamination during tracheal suctioning. This equipment could be systematically used to reduce risk of cross contamination in the intensive care unit.
Copyright © 2011 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh：

Year:  2011        PMID： 21514008     DOI： 10.1016/j.ajic.2010.10.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Infect Control        ISSN： 0196-6553            Impact factor:   2.918


  2 in total

1.  Comparison of the Effect of Open and Closed Endotracheal Suctioning Methods on Pain and Agitation in Medical ICU Patients: A Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Raziyeh Dastdadeh; Abbas Ebadi; Amir Vahedian-Azimi
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2016-07-31

2.  Environmental contamination in the isolation rooms of COVID-19 patients with severe pneumonia requiring mechanical ventilation or high-flow oxygen therapy.

Authors:  J Y Ahn; S An; Y Sohn; Y Cho; J H Hyun; Y J Baek; M H Kim; S J Jeong; J H Kim; N S Ku; J-S Yeom; D M Smith; H Lee; D Yong; Y-J Lee; J W Kim; H R Kim; J Hwang; J Y Choi
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2020-08-21       Impact factor: 3.926
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.