Literature DB >> 21513936

Survival trends and predictors of mortality in severe pelvic trauma: estimates from the German Pelvic Trauma Registry Initiative.

Tim Pohlemann1, Dirk Stengel, Georgios Tosounidis, Heinrich Reilmann, Fabian Stuby, Uli Stöckle, Andreas Seekamp, Hagen Schmal, Andreas Thannheimer, Francis Holmenschlager, Axel Gänsslen, Pol Maria Rommens, Thomas Fuchs, Friedel Baumgärtel, Ivan Marintschev, Gert Krischak, Stephan Wunder, Harald Tscherne, Ulf Culemann.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To determine longitudinal trends in mortality, and the contribution of specific injury characteristics and treatment modalities to the risk of a fatal outcome after severe and complex pelvic trauma.
METHODS: We studied 5048 patients with pelvic ring fractures enrolled in the German Pelvic Trauma Registry Initiative between 1991 and 1993, 1998 and 2000, and 2004 and 2006. Complete datasets were available for 5014 cases, including 508 complex injuries, defined as unstable fractures with severe peri-pelvic soft tissue and organ laceration. Multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression analysis was employed to evaluate the impact of demographic, injury- and treatment-associated variables on all-cause in-hospital mortality.
RESULTS: All-cause in-hospital mortality declined from 8% (39/466) in 1991 to 5% (33/638) in 2006. Controlling for age, Injury Severity Score, pelvic vessel injury, the need for emergency laparotomy, and application of a pelvic clamp, the odds ratio (OR) per annum was 0.94 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.91-0.96). However, the risk of death did not decrease significantly in patients with complex injuries (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.93-1.03). Raw mortality associated with this type of injury was 18% (95% CI 9-32%) in 2006.
CONCLUSION: In contrast to an overall decline in trauma mortality, complex pelvic ring injuries remain associated with a significant risk of death. Awareness of this potentially life-threatening condition should be increased amongst trauma care professionals, and early management protocols need to be implemented to improve the survival prognosis.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21513936     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.03.053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  34 in total

1.  Initial experience using a pelvic emergency simulator to train reduction in blood loss.

Authors:  Tim Pohlemann; Ulf Culemann; Joerg H Holstein
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  [Influence of the pelvic trauma registry of the DGU on treatment of pelvic ring fractures].

Authors:  J H Holstein; F M Stuby; S C Herath; U Culemann; E Aghayev; T Pohlemann
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 3.  [Percutaneous stabilization of the anterior pelvic ring in osteoporotic fractures].

Authors:  J Wilke; D Pennig
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  Age and "general health"-beside fracture classification-affect the therapeutic decision for geriatric pelvic ring fractures: a German pelvic injury register study.

Authors:  Andreas Höch; Philipp Pieroh; Florian Gras; Tim Hohmann; Sven Märdian; Francis Holmenschlager; Holger Keil; Hans-Georg Palm; Steven C Herath; Christoph Josten; Hagen Schmal; Fabian M Stuby
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Surgical therapy of hip-joint empyema. Is the Girdlestone arthroplasty still up to date?

Authors:  Ralf Oheim; Justus Gille; Rita Schoop; Sonja Mägerlein; Cornelius H Grimme; Christian Jürgens; Ulf-Joachim Gerlach
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-10-02       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Evaluation of bone viability in patients after girdlestone arthroplasty: comparison of bone SPECT/CT and MRI.

Authors:  G Diederichs; P Hoppe; F Collettini; G Wassilew; B Hamm; W Brenner; M R Makowski
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  The utility of FAST for initial abdominal screening of major pelvic fracture patients.

Authors:  Diederik O F Verbeek; Ijsbrand A J Zijlstra; Christaan van der Leij; Kornelis J Ponsen; Otto M van Delden; J Carel Goslings
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 8.  [Pelvic ring fractures in the elderly. Underestimated osteoporotic fracture].

Authors:  T Fuchs; U Rottbeck; V Hofbauer; M Raschke; R Stange
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.000

9.  [Current treatment of pelvic ring fractures].

Authors:  U Culemann; H J Oestern; T Pohlemann
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 10.  [Current treatment of pelvic ring fractures].

Authors:  U Culemann; H J Oestern; T Pohlemann
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 0.955

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.