Literature DB >> 21513934

Traumatic damage to the cartilage influences outcome of anatomically reduced acetabular fractures: a medium-term retrospective analysis.

P M Rommens1, P Ingelfinger, T E Nowak, S Kuhn, M H Hessmann.   

Abstract

We reviewed 77 patients with an acetabular fracture, treated operatively through a non-extensile approach after an average time of 45 months. The ilioinguinal approach was chosen in 41, the Kocher-Langenbeck approach in 36 patients. Following the Letournel classification, the most frequent lesions were posterior wall (26%), two-column (22.1%) and anterior column (14.3%) fractures. Subchondral impaction, intra-articular fracture fragments and fracture comminution, called modifiers, could be identified in the preoperative CT-data of 38 patients (49.4%). Patients were operated after an average of 4 days. Average hospital stay was 19 days. Sciatic nerve and peroneal nerve palsy were registered in 5.6%. Deep venous thrombosis was seen in 10.4%, peri-articular ossifications in 7.8%. During the 45-months follow-up, 10.4% patients needed secondary total hip arthroplasty. Using the Merle d'Aubigné score, 15 patients had an excellent, 39 a good, 15 a moderate, and 8 a bad result. In accordance with the Harris Hip Score, 29 patients achieved an excellent, 26 a good, 9 a moderate and 13 a bad result. Twenty of twenty-three (Merle d'Aubigné score) and twenty of twenty-two (Harris Hop Score) patients with moderate or bad results had one or more modifiers. Patients with operatively treated acetabular fractures, who had CT-findings such as subchondral impaction, fracture comminution or intra-articular fracture fragments in their preoperative examination, score significantly lower at middle term in the Harris Hip and Merle d'Aubigné scoring systems.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21513934     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.03.058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  7 in total

1.  Classifications in brief: Letournel classification for acetabular fractures.

Authors:  Timothy B Alton; Albert O Gee
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-11-09       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  [Surgical treatment of acetabulum fractures in the elderly. Osteosynthesis or endoprosthesis].

Authors:  C Fölsch; M M Alwani; V Jurow; R Stiletto
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  Early reduction of acetabular fractures decreases the risk of post-traumatic hip osteoarthritis?

Authors:  Mario Cahueque; Marcos Martínez; Andrés Cobar; María Bregni
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2017-01-13

4.  Quality of life from return to work and sports activities to sexual dysfunction after surgical treatment of acetabular fractures.

Authors:  Andrea Stefano Monteleone; Pietro Feltri; Mauro Natale Molina; Jochen Müller; Giuseppe Filardo; Christian Candrian
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-02-26       Impact factor: 3.067

5.  Rationales for the Bernese approaches in acetabular surgery.

Authors:  M J B Keel; T M Ecker; K-A Siebenrock; J D Bastian
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2012-09-30       Impact factor: 3.693

6.  Predictors of poor outcome after both column acetabular fractures: a 30-year retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Philipp Lichte; Richard M Sellei; Philipp Kobbe; Derek G Dombroski; Axel Gänsslen; Hans-Christoph Pape
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2013-03-19

7.  Open reduction and internal fixation of acetabular fractures in patients of old age.

Authors:  Pol Maria Rommens; Roland Schwab; Kristin Handrich; Charlotte Arand; Daniel Wagner; Alexander Hofmann
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 3.075

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.