Literature DB >> 21513614

An evaluation of on-site oral fluid drug screening devices DrugWipe 5+ and Rapid STAT using oral fluid for confirmation analysis.

Anna Pehrsson1, Tom Blencowe, Kari Vimpari, Kaarina Langel, Charlotta Engblom, Pirjo Lillsunde.   

Abstract

In this study, the performance of two on-site oral fluid drug-testing devices, DrugWipe 5(+) (Securetec) and Rapid STAT (Mavand), was assessed. The results obtained by the devices were compared with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry confirmation analysis results in oral fluid. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the tests, as well as positive and negative predictive values, were calculated based on the classified results of the comparison. Both of the devices were evaluated for their ability to meet toxicological cutoffs as set in the DRUID project (www.druid-project.eu) as well as those reported by the manufacturers. The evaluation was performed for relevant drug groups of both devices: amphetamines, cannabis, cocaine, and opiates. Additionally, Rapid STAT has a test for benzodiazepines included in the same device. Both tests seemed to perform quite well for amphetamines although they also gave negative results for cases with high concentrations. Also, the benzodiazepine test of Rapid STAT was at a relatively good level although only half of the positive test results were true positives using the test cutoffs. The same phenomenon was detected for the cannabis tests of both devices. The proper evaluation of cocaine and opiates tests was not applicable because of the very low number of positive cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21513614     DOI: 10.1093/anatox/35.4.211

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anal Toxicol        ISSN: 0146-4760            Impact factor:   3.367


  9 in total

Review 1.  Current knowledge on cannabinoids in oral fluid.

Authors:  Dayong Lee; Marilyn A Huestis
Journal:  Drug Test Anal       Date:  2013-08-25       Impact factor: 3.345

2.  Concordance of self-reported drug use and saliva drug tests in a sample of emergency department patients.

Authors:  Scott Macdonald; Cheryl J Cherpitel; Tim Stockwell; Gina Martin; Sonya Ishiguro; Kate Vallance; Jeff Brubacher
Journal:  J Subst Use       Date:  2014-03-01

3.  Rapid detection and quantitation of drugs-of-abuse by wooden-tip electrospray ionization mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Tsz-Tsun Ng; Pui-Kin So; Bin Hu; Zhong-Ping Yao
Journal:  J Food Drug Anal       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 6.157

4.  Alcohol use in the prehospital setting: a diagnostic challenge in patients treated by a physician staffed mobile intensive care unit.

Authors:  Terhi Kauppila; Janne Virta; Leena Lindgren; Ilkka Virkkunen; Antti Kämäräinen
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-08-03

Review 5.  Correlation between Blood and Oral Fluid Psychoactive Drug Concentrations and Cognitive Impairment in Driving under the Influence of Drugs.

Authors:  Francesco Paolo Busardo; Simona Pichini; Manuela Pellegrini; Angelo Montana; Alfredo Fabrizio Lo Faro; Simona Zaami; Silvia Graziano
Journal:  Curr Neuropharmacol       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 7.363

6.  Detection of Δ9 THC in oral fluid following vaporized cannabis with varied cannabidiol (CBD) content: An evaluation of two point-of-collection testing devices.

Authors:  Thomas R Arkell; Richard C Kevin; Jordyn Stuart; Nicholas Lintzeris; Paul S Haber; Johannes G Ramaekers; Iain S McGregor
Journal:  Drug Test Anal       Date:  2019-09-10       Impact factor: 3.345

7.  A Study on the Reliability of an On-Site Oral Fluid Drug Test in a Recreational Context.

Authors:  Stefano Gentili; Renata Solimini; Roberta Tittarelli; Giulio Mannocchi; Francesco Paolo Busardò
Journal:  J Anal Methods Chem       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 2.193

Review 8.  Analytical Methods Used for the Detection and Quantification of Benzodiazepines.

Authors:  Zidane Qriouet; Zineb Qmichou; Nadia Bouchoutrouch; Hassan Mahi; Yahia Cherrah; Hassan Sefrioui
Journal:  J Anal Methods Chem       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 2.193

Review 9.  Roadside Drug Testing Approaches.

Authors:  Manal A Alhefeiti; James Barker; Iltaf Shah
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-05-29       Impact factor: 4.411

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.