| Literature DB >> 21513574 |
Morteza Naserbakht1, Hamid-Reza Ahmadkhaniha, Bahareh Mokri, Cassandra L Smith.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Since 1958 many, but not all studies have demonstrated that paternal age is a risk factor for schizophrenia. There may be many different explanations for differences between studies, including study design, sample size, collection criteria, heterogeneity and the confounding effects of environmental factors that can for example perturb epigenetic programming and lead to an increase in disease risk. The small number of children in Western families makes risk comparisons between siblings born at different paternal ages difficult. In contrast, more Eastern families have children both at early and later periods of life. In the present study, a cross-sectional population study in an Iranian population was performed to compare frequency of schizophrenia in younger offspring (that is, older paternal age) versus older offspring.Entities:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21513574 PMCID: PMC3094249 DOI: 10.1186/1744-859X-10-15
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Gen Psychiatry ISSN: 1744-859X Impact factor: 3.455
Demographic characteristics of cases and controls
| Cases (%) | Controls (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Sex: | |||
| Male | 62.7 | 61.8 | 0.84a |
| Female | 37.3 | 38.2 | |
| Education: | |||
| Illiterate | 3.6 | 5 | 0.87a |
| Lower than diploma level | 48.2 | 49.5 | |
| Diploma | 39.5 | 35.5 | |
| Higher than diploma | 86 | 10 | |
| Paternal age at parturition (mean ± SD) | 30.5 ± 6.2 | 26.4 ± 5.6 | 0.001b |
| Maternal age at parturition (mean ± SD) | 25 ± 4.5 | 26.1 ± 5.4 | 0.02c |
| Familial history of major psychiatric disorder: | |||
| Yes | 45(20.5%) | 29(13.2%) | 0.041a |
| No | 155(79.5%) | 171(86.8%) | |
| Birth rank | |||
| 1 | 48 (21.8) | 61 (27.7) | 0.037b |
| 2 | 95 (43.2) | 106 (48.2) | |
| ≥3 | 77 (35%) | 53 (24.1) | |
P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
aχ2 test; bMann-Whitney U test; ct test.
Analysis of the effect of paternal age on cases (n = 220) and controls (n = 220)
| Estimate | Standard error | Wald | Degrees of freedom | Significance | 95% CI | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower bound | Upper bound | |||||||
| Family history | 0.458 | 0.268 | 2.921 | 1 | 0.087 | 0.387 | 1.702 | |
| Birth rank | 01 sFebruary | 0.281 | 0.355 | 0.626 | 1 | 0.429 | 0.984 | 0.984 |
| 3.3+ | 0.286 | 0.317 | 0.817 | 1 | 366 | 0.415 | 0.415 | |
| Paternal age | 32+ | 1.425 | 0.39 | 13.336 | 1 | 0 | 0.334 | 0.334 |
| Maternal age | 32+ | -0.258 | 0.421 | 0.376 | 1 | 0.54 | 2.189 | 2.189 |
Sample classes as a function of parental or maternal age at birth
| Group | Parental age at birth, n (%) | Total ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paternal | Maternal | ||||
| <32 years | >32 years | <32 years | >32 years | ||
| Cases | 144 (76) | 76 (34.5) | 195 (88.5) | 25 (11.5) | 220 (100) |
| Controls | 187 (85) | 33 (15) | 206 (93.5) | 14 (6.5) | 220 (100) |
Figure 1Distribution of paternal age in case and control subjects.
Stepwise analysis of the effect of paternal age on cases, controls
| B | Standard error | Significance | Exp(B) | 95% CI for Exp(B) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | ||||||
| Step 1 | Birth rank | 0.313 | 0.131 | 0.017 | 1.368 | 1.058 | 1.769 |
| Constant | -0.642 | 0.285 | 0.025 | 0.526 | |||
| Step 2 | Birth rank | 0.237 | 0.142 | 0.096 | 1.268 | 0.959 | 1.676 |
| Family history | 0.481 | 0.263 | 0.067 | 1.618 | 0.967 | 2.707 | |
| Maternal age | 0.387 | 0.377 | 0.304 | 1.473 | 0.704 | 3.083 | |
| Constant | -0.599 | 0.297 | 0.044 | 0.550 | |||
| Step 3 | Birth rank | -0.115 | 0.169 | 0.496 | 0.891 | 0.640 | 1.241 |
| Family history | 0.444 | 0.268 | 0.098 | 1.559 | 0.922 | 2.638 | |
| Maternal age | -0.374 | 0.431 | 0.386 | 0.688 | 0.296 | 1.602 | |
| Paternal age | 1.329 | 0.336 | 0.000 | 3.778 | 1.955 | 7.304 | |
| Constant | -0.123 | 0.321 | 0.703 | 0.885 | |||