| Literature DB >> 21512799 |
Karen Søgaard1, Anne Katrine Blangsted, Pernille Kofoed Nielsen, Lone Hansen, Lars L Andersen, Pernille Vedsted, Gisela Sjøgaard.
Abstract
The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to assess changes in myalgic trapezius activation, muscle oxygenation, and pain intensity during repetitive and stressful work tasks in response to 10 weeks of training. In total, 39 women with a clinical diagnosis of trapezius myalgia were randomly assigned to: (1) general fitness training performed as leg-bicycling (GFT); (2) specific strength training of the neck/shoulder muscles (SST) or (3) reference intervention without physical exercise. Electromyographic activity (EMG), tissue oxygenation (near infrared spectroscopy), and pain intensity were measured in trapezius during pegboard and stress tasks before and after the intervention period. During the pegboard task, GFT improved trapezius oxygenation from a relative decrease of -0.83 ± 1.48 μM to an increase of 0.05 ± 1.32 μM, and decreased pain development by 43%, but did not affect resting levels of pain. SST lowered the relative EMG amplitude by 36%, and decreased pain during resting and working conditions by 52 and 38%, respectively, without affecting trapezius oxygenation. In conclusion, GFT performed as leg-bicycling decreased pain development during repetitive work tasks, possibly due to improved oxygenation of the painful muscles. SST lowered the overall level of pain both during rest and work, possibly due to a lowered relative exposure as evidenced by a lowered relative EMG. The results demonstrate differential adaptive mechanisms of contrasting physical exercise interventions on chronic muscle pain at rest and during repetitive work tasks.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21512799 PMCID: PMC3253274 DOI: 10.1007/s00421-011-1964-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol ISSN: 1439-6319 Impact factor: 3.078
NIRS nadir (O2Hb and THb) and peak (HHb) values during the first 4 min of the pegboard work before and after the 10 weeks intervention period
| O2Hb nadir | HHb peak | THb nadir | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before | After | Before | After | Before | After | |
| GFT | −1.22 ± 0.95§ | −0.76 ± 0.57* | 0.48 ± 0.38§ | 0.50 ± 0.50 | −1.20 ± 1.22§ | −0.68 ± 0.79 |
| SST | −1.24 ± 0.91§ | −0.99 ± 0.75 | 0.48 ± 0.49§ | 0.39 ± 0.48 | −1.23 ± 1.20§ | −0.84 ± 0.64* |
| REF | −1.51 ± 1.31§ | −1.52 ± 1.57 | 0.49 ± 0.32§ | 0.39 ± 0.58 | −1.62 ± 1.47§ | −1.75 ± 1.81 |
Values are given as changes from resting conditions in μM (means ± SD)
NIRS near-infrared spectroscopy, O Hb oxyhemoglobin, HHb deoxyhemoglobin, THb total hemoglobin, GFT general fitness training (n = 15), SST specific strength training (n = 16), REF reference intervention without physical activity (n = 8)
* Significantly different (p < 0.05) from value before the intervention
§Value significantly ≠0 (p < 0.05)
Fig. 1NIRS changes (means ± SE) in the trapezius muscle during the pegboard work task before (unfilled circles) and after (filled squares) the 10 weeks intervention period. O Hb oxyhemoglobin, HHb deoxyhemoglobin, THb total hemoglobin, GFT general fitness training (n = 15), SST specific strength training (n = 16), REF reference intervention without physical activity (n = 8). Significant Intervention*round effect was found for O2Hb, HHb and THb [(DF = 6, F = 7.94, p < 0.0001), (DF = 6, F = 4.59, p < 0.0005), and (DF = 6, F = 5.25, p < 0.0002), respectively]. Asterisk indicates significant difference between before and after the intervention after post hoc analysis with adjusted p value below 0.05
Pain intensity (VAS) at rest and the rate of pain development during the 40 min pegboard work before and after the 10 weeks intervention period
| Rest value (mm) | Rate of pain development (mm/min) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before | After | Before | After | |
| GFT | 30.9 ± 22.5 | 26.5 ± 23.2 | 0.65 ± 0.37 | 0.37 ± 0.34* |
| SST | 23.2 ± 23.1 | 11.2 ± 11.8* | 0.61 ± 0.51 | 0.45 ± 0.47 |
| REF | 25.6 ± 22.5 | 17.5 ± 16.9 | 0.70 ± 0.68 | 0.67 ± 0.68 |
Values are mean ± SD
GFT general fitness training (n = 15), SST specific strength training (n = 16), REF reference intervention without physical activity (n = 8)
* Significantly different from value before the intervention, p < 0.05