Literature DB >> 21512775

The Global Campaign, World Health Organization and Lifting The Burden: collaboration in action.

Timothy J Steiner, Gretchen L Birbeck, Rigmor Jensen, Zaza Katsarava, Paolo Martelletti, Lars Jacob Stovner.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21512775      PMCID: PMC3094667          DOI: 10.1007/s10194-011-0342-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Headache Pain        ISSN: 1129-2369            Impact factor:   7.277


× No keyword cloud information.
At the end of last year, we wrote of the achievements of Lifting The Burden (LTB) in its conduct of the Global Campaign against Headache [1]. In the time since, a notable event has occurred. Earlier in that year, LTB was invited by the World Health Organization (WHO) to apply for admission into Official Relations with it. LTB duly did so and, in January 2011, the Executive Board of WHO considered and approved the application [2]. LTB joins about 190 other nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) worldwide. Without question, this is an added marker of LTB’s considerable success in its formative years. It is the outcome of an objective and dispassionate assessment by WHO’s Executive Board not only of LTB’s track record but also of its future promise. This reflection, however, is introspective. What does it mean for headache? First, it is further acknowledgment by WHO that headache disorders are major causes of public ill-health. This is important: WHO is responsible for “providing leadership on global health matters, shaping the health research agenda, setting norms and standards, articulating evidence-based policy options, providing technical support to countries and monitoring and assessing health trends” [3]. We want headache to be not simply in WHO’s consciousness but among its priorities. Official Relations are the only formal relations recognized by WHO [4]. According to its Constitution, a principal function of WHO “is to act as the directing and coordinating authority on international health work”, in support of which it “may make suitable arrangements for consultation and cooperation with NGOs in carrying out its international health work” [4]. More specifically, the objectives of WHO’s relations with NGOs “are to promote the policies, strategies and activities of WHO and, where appropriate, to collaborate with NGOs in jointly agreed activities to implement them” [5]. Official Relations are the basis of a long-term partnership in a shared cause, which here is reduction of the burden of headache worldwide. Under the terms of Official Relations, a work-plan of activities is agreed, and in LTB’s case these are key activities of the Global Campaign against Headache. Second, it gives headache louder voice within WHO, and in the circle of WHO’s other partners. This is important, too. It is through WHO that migraine was included in the Global Burden of Disease Study 2000 [6], and again through WHO that LTB was asked to collaborate in the new Global Burden of Disease Study 2010 [7] and secured inclusion this time of tension-type headache and medication-overuse headache. Among the privileges conferred by Official Relations is entitlement to appoint a representative to participate, without right of vote, in WHO’s meetings [5]. Third, it gives headache voice in political circles [8-11]. It is not easy for NGOs to capture the attention of politicians, but this has to be done. Little can be achieved in translating the important discoveries of headache research into treatments administered to people with headache unless policy-makers create the health services that make these treatments available. It remains the case that the lives of the vast majority of people with headache in the world are untouched by the advances of the last 20 years. For the Global Campaign, acceptance into Official Relations with WHO is a milestone. For collaborators in the Campaign’s programme of activities, it is a major encouragement and a spur to new ventures. For people with headache, it means the Campaign can work better on their behalf and is a promise of enhanced effectiveness in its efforts [1, 12, 13]. The fruits will be borne in the next years.
  4 in total

1.  Lifting the burden: The global campaign against headache.

Authors:  T J Steiner
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 44.182

2.  Lifting the burden: the first 7 years.

Authors:  Timothy J Steiner; Gretchen L Birbeck; Rigmor Jensen; Zaza Katsarava; Paolo Martelletti; Lars Jacob Stovner
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 7.277

Review 3.  Lifting The Burden: the global campaign to reduce the burden of headache worldwide.

Authors:  Timothy J Steiner
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2005-09-21       Impact factor: 7.277

4.  The definitive position of headache among the major public health challenges. An end to the slippery slope of disregard.

Authors:  Paolo Martelletti; Timothy J Steiner; José M Bertolote; Tarun Dua; Benedetto Saraceno
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 7.277

  4 in total
  38 in total

Review 1.  Treatment of perimenstrual migraine with triptans: an update.

Authors:  Barbara Casolla; Luana Lionetto; Serena Candela; Lidia D'Alonzo; Andrea Negro; Maurizio Simmaco; Paolo Martelletti
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2012-10

Review 2.  A Critical Evaluation on MOH Current Treatments.

Authors:  Andrea Negro; Martina Curto; Luana Lionetto; Simona Guerzoni; Luigi Alberto Pini; Paolo Martelletti
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 3.  Outcome of Chronic Daily Headache or Chronic Migraine.

Authors:  Soo-Jin Cho; Tae-Jin Song; Min Kyung Chu
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2016-01

Review 4.  Quality in the provision of headache care. 2: defining quality and its indicators.

Authors:  Michele Peters; Crispin Jenkinson; Suraj Perera; Elizabeth Loder; Rigmor Jensen; Zaza Katsarava; Raquel Gil Gouveia; Susan Broner; Timothy Steiner
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 7.277

5.  The burden of primary headache disorders in Zambia: national estimates from a population-based door-to-door survey.

Authors:  Edward Mbewe; Pachuau Zairemthiama; Ravi Paul; Gretchen L Birbeck; Timothy J Steiner
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 7.277

6.  Headache disorders and public ill-health in India: prevalence estimates in Karnataka State.

Authors:  Girish B Kulkarni; Girish N Rao; Gopalkrishna Gururaj; Lars J Stovner; Timothy J Steiner
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 7.277

7.  Editorial. Valuing headache's solution.

Authors:  T J Steiner; M Tinelli
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 7.277

8.  The Global Burden of Disease survey 2010, Lifting The Burden and thinking outside-the-box on headache disorders.

Authors:  Paolo Martelletti; Gretchen L Birbeck; Zaza Katsarava; Rigmor H Jensen; Lars J Stovner; Timothy J Steiner
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 7.277

9.  The burden of headache disorders in Pakistan: methodology of a population-based nationwide study, and questionnaire validation.

Authors:  Arif D Herekar; Akbar A Herekar; Ali Ahmad; Umer L Uqaili; Bilal Ahmed; Jahanzeb Effendi; Syed Z Alvi; Timothy J Steiner
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 7.277

10.  Productivity losses attributable to headache, and their attempted recovery, in a heavy-manufacturing workforce in Turkey: implications for employers and politicians.

Authors:  H Macit Selekler; Gürsel Gökmen; T Müge Alvur; Timothy J Steiner
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 7.277

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.