BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Exaggerated pressure fluctuation between the thorax and abdomen during exercise or with pulmonary disease may challenge the gastroesophageal barrier and allow reflux of gastric juice into the esophagus. The aim of this study was to investigate the pressure differentials in the region of the gastroesophageal junction to better understand the relationship between the thoraco-abdominal pressure gradient and the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) barrier function. METHODS: We reviewed the esophageal motility and 24-h pH studies in 151 patients with a manometrically normal lower esophageal sphincter who did not have pulmonary disease, history of anti-reflux surgery, hiatal hernia, or ineffective esophageal motility (IEM). Intra-abdominal gastric and intra-thoracic esophageal pressure fluctuations with respiration were measured and the thoraco-abdominal pressure gradients were calculated during both inspiratory and expiratory phases of the respiratory cycle. Predictive factors for an abnormal composite pH score were identified by multivariable analysis. RESULTS: An inspiratory thoraco-abdominal pressure gradient that was higher than the resting LES pressure was found in 27 patients. In 23 of these patients (85.2%) there was increased esophageal acid exposure (OR 13.5, 95% CI 4.4-41.8). An abnormal composite pH score was predicted by a high inspiratory thoraco-abdominal pressure gradient (P < 0.001), greater fluctuation between inspiratory and expiratory thoracic pressure (P = 0.023), lower LES resting pressure (P = 0.049) and a decreased residual pressure after a swallow induced relaxation (P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The gastroesophageal barrier function of the LES can be overcome during times when the inspiratory thoraco-abdominal pressure gradient is increased, leading to reflux of gastric juice into the esophagus. This implies that exaggerated ventilatory effort, as occurs with exercise or in respiratory disease, can result in gastroesophageal reflux.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Exaggerated pressure fluctuation between the thorax and abdomen during exercise or with pulmonary disease may challenge the gastroesophageal barrier and allow reflux of gastric juice into the esophagus. The aim of this study was to investigate the pressure differentials in the region of the gastroesophageal junction to better understand the relationship between the thoraco-abdominal pressure gradient and the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) barrier function. METHODS: We reviewed the esophageal motility and 24-h pH studies in 151 patients with a manometrically normal lower esophageal sphincter who did not have pulmonary disease, history of anti-reflux surgery, hiatal hernia, or ineffective esophageal motility (IEM). Intra-abdominal gastric and intra-thoracic esophageal pressure fluctuations with respiration were measured and the thoraco-abdominal pressure gradients were calculated during both inspiratory and expiratory phases of the respiratory cycle. Predictive factors for an abnormal composite pH score were identified by multivariable analysis. RESULTS: An inspiratory thoraco-abdominal pressure gradient that was higher than the resting LES pressure was found in 27 patients. In 23 of these patients (85.2%) there was increased esophageal acid exposure (OR 13.5, 95% CI 4.4-41.8). An abnormal composite pH score was predicted by a high inspiratory thoraco-abdominal pressure gradient (P < 0.001), greater fluctuation between inspiratory and expiratory thoracic pressure (P = 0.023), lower LES resting pressure (P = 0.049) and a decreased residual pressure after a swallow induced relaxation (P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The gastroesophageal barrier function of the LES can be overcome during times when the inspiratory thoraco-abdominal pressure gradient is increased, leading to reflux of gastric juice into the esophagus. This implies that exaggerated ventilatory effort, as occurs with exercise or in respiratory disease, can result in gastroesophageal reflux.
Authors: Shahin Ayazi; Anand Tamhankar; Steven R DeMeester; Joerg Zehetner; Calvin Wu; John C Lipham; Jeffrey A Hagen; Tom R DeMeester Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Shahin Ayazi; Jessica M Leers; Arzu Oezcelik; Emmanuele Abate; Christian G Peyre; Jeffrey A Hagen; Steven R DeMeester; Farzaneh Banki; John C Lipham; Tom R DeMeester; Peter F Crookes Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2008-12-06 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: C Casanova; J S Baudet; M del Valle Velasco; J M Martin; A Aguirre-Jaime; J P de Torres; J Pablo de Torres; B R Celli Journal: Eur Respir J Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 16.671
Authors: Leonardo M Del Grande; Fernando A M Herbella; Amilcar M Bigatao; Jose R Jardim; Marco G Patti Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2016-06-27 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Abdul Latif Hamdan; Georges Ziade; Maher Kasti; Leslie Akl; Ibrahim Bawab; Nadim Kanj Journal: Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2016-12-18
Authors: Stefano Siboni; Luigi Bonavina; Benjamin D Rogers; Ciara Egan; Edoardo Savarino; C Prakash Gyawali; Tom R DeMeester Journal: J Clin Gastroenterol Date: 2022-09-07 Impact factor: 3.174
Authors: Abdul-Latif Hamdan; G Ziade; Z Turfe; N Beydoun; D Sarieddine; N Kanj Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2015-11-14 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Marco E Allaix; P Marco Fisichella; Imre Noth; Bernardino M Mendez; Marco G Patti Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2013-04-25 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Min Chul Kim; Amir Ben Yehuda; Young-Woo Kim; Hong Man Yoon; Harbi Khalayleh; Won Ho Han; Hirokazu Noshiro Journal: J Minim Invasive Surg Date: 2020-12-15