| Literature DB >> 21511906 |
Iker Aranjuelo1, Llorenç Cabrera-Bosquet, Rosa Morcuende, Jean Christophe Avice, Salvador Nogués, José Luis Araus, Rafael Martínez-Carrasco, Pilar Pérez.
Abstract
Wheat plants (Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21511906 PMCID: PMC3134354 DOI: 10.1093/jxb/err095
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Exp Bot ISSN: 0022-0957 Impact factor: 6.992
Effect of [CO2] during growth on wheat total, flag leaf, ear, and ear DM/total DM, together with photosynthesis, stomatal conductance (gs) and intercellular CO2 (Ci) determined at 370 (A370, gs370, and Ci370, respectively) and 700 (A700, gs700, and Ci700, respectively) μmol mol−1 [CO2] 14 d after anthesis
| Parameter | Ambient CO2 | Elevated CO2 |
| Total DM (g m−2) | 2287.1±510.4a | 1871.2±171.9a |
| Flag leaf DM (g m−2) | 92.3±15.3a | 73.3±152a |
| Ear DM (g m−2) | 662.0±240.0a | 426.7±46.9a (P=0.093) |
| Ear DM/total DM | 0.29±0.09a | 0.23±0.01a |
| 14.59±5.5a | 3.77±0.61b | |
| 33.7±6.0a | 21.6±4.4b | |
| 146.9±62.3a | 51.8±4.73b | |
| 184.3±46.4a | 124.0±35.7b | |
| Ci370 (μmol mol−1) | 153.6±12.7b | 277.0±9.90a |
| Ci700 (μmol mol−1) | 324.517.6a | 345.978.7a |
Each value represents the mean ±SE (n=6). Different letters indicate significant differences (P<0.05) between treatments and genotypes as determined by ANOVA test.
Fig. 1.Elevated [CO2] effect on wheat flag leaf and ear glucose, sucrose, fructans, and starch content 14 d after anthesis. Open bars correspond to plants grown under ambient CO2 (∼370 μmol mol−1) and closed bars to those grown under elevated CO2 (∼700 μmol mol−1). Each value represents the mean ±SE (n=4). The different symbols indicate non-significant differences (ns), significant differences P<0.05 (*) and P<0.01 (**) between treatments as determined by LSD.
Fig. 2.Elevated [CO2] effect on wheat flag leaf and ear N content and C/N ratio 14 d after anthesis. Open bars correspond to plants grown under ambient CO2 (∼370 μmol mol−1) and closed bars to those grown under elevated CO2 (∼700 μmol mol−1). Otherwise as in Fig. 1.
Fig. 3.Elevated [CO2] effect on wheat flag leaf N, TSP, Rubisco, amino acid content, and Rubisco as a percentage of TSP 14 d after anthesis. Otherwise as in Fig. 1.
Fig. 4.Elevated [CO2] effect on wheat flag leaf total Rubisco activity, Rubisco activation, and Rubisco kcat 14 d after anthesis. Open bars correspond to plants grown under ambient CO2 (∼370 μmol mol−1) and closed bars to those grown under elevated CO2 (∼700 μmol mol−1). Otherwise as in Fig. 1.
Fig. 5.Elevated [CO2] effect on wheat flag leaf and ear 13C isotopic composition (δ13C) in TOM, respired CO2, (DR CO2), TSS, glucose (Glu), sucrose (Suc), fructans (Fru), and starch (HCl-C). A and E stand for ambient and elevated [CO2], respectively, before labelling (pre-labelling period). T0 refers to the end of labelling (labelling period; 14 d after anthesis), whereas T1 and T2 refer to 24 h and 48 h after the end of labelling (post-labelling period), respectively. Otherwise as in Fig. 1.
Fig. 6.Silver-stained two-dimensional gel electrophoresis of proteins extracted from wheat leaves grown under ambient and elevated conditions 14 days after anthesis. In the first dimension, 125 mg of total protein was loaded on a 18 cm IEF strip with a linear gradient of pH 4–7. The second dimension was conducted in 12% polyacrylamide (w/v) gels (20 × 20 cm) (for details see ``Materials and Methods''). The gel image analyses was conducted with Progenesis SameSpots software v3.0 and the subsequent mass spectrometry analyses identified up to 14 proteins (marked by arrows) with significantly different expression in elevated [CO2].
Annotation of elevated [CO2] up-regulated spots identified in silver-stained 2-DE gels of leaves collected 14 d after anthesis
| Spot no. | Spot % volume variations | pI/ | PM | SC (%) | Score ( | Protein name/organism/NCBI accession no. |
| 01. Metabolism | ||||||
| 104 | 198.03 | 6.25/32.01 | 7 | 28 | 249 | Chloroplastic carbonic anhydrase/gi|729003 |
| 02. Energy | ||||||
| 7 | 627.13 | 5.51/62.91 | 2 | 11 | 55 | Phosphoglycerate mutase/gi|32400802 |
| 07. Transporters | ||||||
| 45 | 314.21 | 4.05/54.82 | 3 | 6 | 98 | ATP synthase β |
| 11. Disease/defence | ||||||
| 116 | 164.06 | 6.48/24.09 | 1 | 6 | 53 | Manganese superoxide |
| 12. Unclear classification | ||||||
| 105 | 188.61 | 8.67/81.43 | 2 | 3 | 53 | Putative blue |
| 123 | 139.12 | 5.35/42.85 | 3 | 3 | 54 | SNF2 superfamily |
| 13. Unclassified | ||||||
| 79 | 244.27 | 4.42/23.86 | 2 | 2 | 63 | Predicted protein |
| 943 | 195.90 | 4.43/24.77 | 4 | 18 | 122 | Hypothetical |
A total of 125 μg of total proteins was loaded on an 18-cm gel strip forming an immobilized linear pH gradient of 4–7. Second-dimension electrophoresis (SDS1258-PAGE) was carried out on 12% polyacrylamide (w/v) gels (20×20 cm; for details see Material and methods).
PM, peptides matching; SC, sequence coverage.
Annotation of elevated [CO2] down-regulated spots identified in silver-stained 2-DE gels of leaves collected 14 d after anthesis
| Spot no. | Spot % volume variations | pI/ | PM | SC (%) | Score ( | Protein name/organism/NCBI accession no. |
| 02. Energy | ||||||
| 114 | 60.59 | 6.21/48.39 | 2 | 8 | 112 | Ribulose-bisphosphate |
| 2090 | 79.12 | 5.81/23.97 | 2 | 5 | 65 | Adenosine diphosphate |
| 11. Disease/defence | ||||||
| 2496 | 87.75 | 4.91/85.64 | 2 | 3 | 81 | Cytosolic heat shock protein |
| 13. Unclassified | ||||||
| 61 | 34.66 | 4.95/24.65 | 2 | 9 | 92 | Hypothetical |
| 68 | 37.85 | 5.20/38.94 | 1 | 91 | 66 | Unknown protein |
| 734 | 28.14 | 5.64/44.58 | 2 | 10 | 103 | Hypothetical |
A total of 125 μg of total proteins was loaded on an 18-cm gel strip forming an immobilized linear pH gradient of 4–7. Second dimension electrophoresis (SDS1258-PAGE) was carried out on 12% polyacrylamide (w/v) gels (20×20 cm) (for details see Material and methods).
PM, peptides matching; SC, sequence coverage.