OBJECTIVES: The primary aim of the study was to determine the antiplatelet effects of prasugrel versus high-dose clopidogrel in patients with high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and, secondarily, their relation to cytochrome (CYP) 2C19*2 carriage. BACKGROUND: High on-treatment platelet reactivity after clopidogrel administration after PCI is linked to the loss-of-function CYP2C19*2 allele and accompanied by an increased risk of adverse events. METHODS: We performed a prospective, randomized, single-blind, crossover study of platelet inhibition by prasugrel 10 mg/day versus high-dose 150 mg/day clopidogrel in 71 (of 210 screened; 33.8%) post-PCI patients with HTPR. Platelet function was assessed by the VerifyNow assay (Accumetrics, San Diego, California), and real-time polymerase chain reaction genotyping was performed for CYP2C19*2 carriage. RESULTS: The primary endpoint of platelet reactivity (measured in platelet reactivity units) at the end of the 2 treatment periods was lower after prasugrel compared with clopidogrel (least-squares estimates 129.4, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 111.1 to 147.7 versus 201.7, 95% CI: 183.2 to 220.2; p < 0.001). The least-squares mean difference between the 2 treatments was -122.9 (95% CI: -166.7 to -79.2, p < 0.001), and -47.5 (95% CI: -79.5 to -15.4, p = 0.004), in carriers and noncarriers of at least 1 mutant allele, respectively. The HTPR rates were lower for prasugrel than for clopidogrel, in all patients (7.5% vs. 35.8%, p < 0.001), in carriers (5.3% vs. 47.4%, p = 0.007), and in noncarriers (8.8% vs. 29.4%, p = 0.005), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with HTPR after PCI, prasugrel is more effective compared with high clopidogrel in reducing platelet reactivity, particularly in CYP2C19*2 carriers. Genotyping guidance might be helpful only in case an increased clopidogrel maintenance dose is considered. (Prasugrel Versus High Dose Clopidogrel in Clopidogrel Resistant Patients Post Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI); NCT01109784).
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: The primary aim of the study was to determine the antiplatelet effects of prasugrel versus high-dose clopidogrel in patients with high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and, secondarily, their relation to cytochrome (CYP) 2C19*2 carriage. BACKGROUND: High on-treatment platelet reactivity after clopidogrel administration after PCI is linked to the loss-of-function CYP2C19*2 allele and accompanied by an increased risk of adverse events. METHODS: We performed a prospective, randomized, single-blind, crossover study of platelet inhibition by prasugrel 10 mg/day versus high-dose 150 mg/day clopidogrel in 71 (of 210 screened; 33.8%) post-PCI patients with HTPR. Platelet function was assessed by the VerifyNow assay (Accumetrics, San Diego, California), and real-time polymerase chain reaction genotyping was performed for CYP2C19*2 carriage. RESULTS: The primary endpoint of platelet reactivity (measured in platelet reactivity units) at the end of the 2 treatment periods was lower after prasugrel compared with clopidogrel (least-squares estimates 129.4, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 111.1 to 147.7 versus 201.7, 95% CI: 183.2 to 220.2; p < 0.001). The least-squares mean difference between the 2 treatments was -122.9 (95% CI: -166.7 to -79.2, p < 0.001), and -47.5 (95% CI: -79.5 to -15.4, p = 0.004), in carriers and noncarriers of at least 1 mutant allele, respectively. The HTPR rates were lower for prasugrel than for clopidogrel, in all patients (7.5% vs. 35.8%, p < 0.001), in carriers (5.3% vs. 47.4%, p = 0.007), and in noncarriers (8.8% vs. 29.4%, p = 0.005), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with HTPR after PCI, prasugrel is more effective compared with high clopidogrel in reducing platelet reactivity, particularly in CYP2C19*2 carriers. Genotyping guidance might be helpful only in case an increased clopidogrel maintenance dose is considered. (Prasugrel Versus High Dose Clopidogrel in Clopidogrel Resistant Patients Post Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI); NCT01109784).
Authors: D Y F So; G A Wells; R McPherson; M Labinaz; M R Le May; C Glover; A J Dick; M Froeschl; J-F Marquis; M H Gollob; L Tran; J Bernick; B Hibbert; J D Roberts Journal: Pharmacogenomics J Date: 2015-04-07 Impact factor: 3.550
Authors: Samuel Pearce; Julian T Maingard; Hong Kuan Kok; Christen D Barras; Jeremy H Russell; Joshua A Hirsch; Ronil V Chandra; Ash Jhamb; Vincent Thijs; Mark Brooks; Hamed Asadi Journal: Clin Neuroradiol Date: 2021-03-01 Impact factor: 3.649
Authors: J F Peterson; J R Field; K M Unertl; J S Schildcrout; D C Johnson; Y Shi; I Danciu; J H Cleator; J M Pulley; J A McPherson; J C Denny; M Laposata; D M Roden; K B Johnson Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2016-02-17 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Richard B Horenstein; Rajnikanth Madabushi; Issam Zineh; Laura M Yerges-Armstrong; Cody J Peer; Robert N Schuck; William Douglas Figg; Alan R Shuldiner; Michael A Pacanowski Journal: J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2014-04-07 Impact factor: 3.126