Literature DB >> 21510719

Primary care physicians' adoption of new drugs is not associated with their clinical interests: a pharmacoepidemiologic study.

Torben Dybdahl1, Jens Søndergaard, Jakob Kragstrup, Ivar Sønbø Kristiansen, Morten Andersen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES. Increasing drug expenditures call for better understanding of the reasons behind individual general practitioners' (GPs') prescribing decisions. The aim was to analyse associations between GPs' clinical interests and their preference for new drugs. DESIGN. Historical cohort study using population-based prescription data and data collected by postal questionnaire. SETTING AND SUBJECTS. A total of 68 single-handed GPs in the County of Funen, Denmark. Main outcome measures. GPs' preferences for two new (2004) drug groups (selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors and angiotensin-II antagonists) were analysed. The preference was defined as the percentage of patients receiving a new drug among first-time users of either the new drug or an older alternative. The GPs' preference proportion was modelled using linear regression analysis. Data from a questionnaire on GPs' interest in corresponding clinical areas (musculoskeletal diseases and hypertension, respectively), continuing medical education (CME) activities, and previous employment were the independent variables. RESULTS. The adjusted mean difference in preference for new drugs between GPs with high and low interest in each of the two clinical areas was 0.4% (95% CI -2.0% to 2.8%), and -2.2% (-15.0% to 10.7%), respectively. Only current CME activities in the area of hypertension were significantly associated with GPs' preference for new drugs (adjusted mean difference 17.9% (95% CI 5.8% to 30.0%). CONCLUSION. No clear association between GPs' self-rated clinical interest and their prescribing of new drugs was found.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21510719      PMCID: PMC3347948          DOI: 10.3109/02813432.2011.570024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care        ISSN: 0281-3432            Impact factor:   2.581


  24 in total

1.  Diffusion of new drugs in Danish general practice.

Authors:  F H Steffensen; H T Sørensen; F Olesen
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.267

2.  The implementation of evidence-based medicine in general practice prescribing.

Authors:  C Salisbury; N Bosanquet; E Wilkinson; A Bosanquet; J Hasler
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Prescribing new drugs: qualitative study of influences on consultants and general practitioners.

Authors:  M I Jones; S M Greenfield; C P Bradley
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-08-18

4.  A qualitative study to explore influences on general practitioners' decisions to prescribe new drugs.

Authors:  Ann Jacoby; Monica Smith; Martin Eccles
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  General practitioners' adoption of new drugs and previous prescribing of drugs belonging to the same therapeutic class: a pharmacoepidemiological study.

Authors:  Torben Dybdahl; Morten Andersen; Jakob Kragstrup; Ivar Sønbø Kristiansen; Jens Søndergaard
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  The Danish prescription registries.

Authors:  D Gaist; H T Sørensen; J Hallas
Journal:  Dan Med Bull       Date:  1997-09

7.  Pressure to prescribe.

Authors:  T Greenhalgh; P Gill
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-12-06

8.  Translating research into practice: are physicians following evidence-based guidelines in the treatment of hypertension?

Authors:  Julia S Holmes; Matt Shevrin; Beth Goldman; David Share
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.929

Review 9.  What drives change? Barriers to and incentives for achieving evidence-based practice.

Authors:  Richard Grol; Michel Wensing
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2004-03-15       Impact factor: 7.738

10.  Influences on GPs' decision to prescribe new drugs-the importance of who says what.

Authors:  Helen Prosser; Solomon Almond; Tom Walley
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.267

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Factors affecting the uptake of new medicines: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Ágnes Lublóy
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 2.655

2.  Barriers and facilitators to the uptake of new medicines into clinical practice: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kristina Medlinskiene; Justine Tomlinson; Iuri Marques; Sue Richardson; Katherine Stirling; Duncan Petty
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-11-05       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  A randomized controlled trial comparing two ways of providing evidence-based drug information to GPs.

Authors:  Ingmarie Skoglund; Cecilia Björkelund; Max Petzold; Ronny Gunnarsson; Margareta Möller
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 2.581

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.