Literature DB >> 21509934

Histomorphometric analysis following augmentation of the posterior mandible using cancellous bone-block allograft.

Joseph Nissan1, Vered Marilena, Ora Gross, Ofer Mardinger, Gavriel Chaushu.   

Abstract

The present study was conducted to histologically and histomorphometrically evaluate the application of cancellous bone-block allografts for the augmentation of the posterior atrophic mandible. Twenty-four consecutive patients underwent augmentation with cancellous bone-block allografts in the posterior mandible. A bony deficiency of at least 3 mm horizontally and/or vertically according to CT para-axial reconstruction served as inclusion criteria. Following 6 months, 85 implants were placed and a cylindrical sample core was collected. All specimens were prepared for histological and histomorphometrical examination. Implant survival rate was 95.3%. Follow-up ranged 12-66 months (mean 43 ± 19 months). The mean newly formed bone was 44 ± 28%, that of the residual cancellous bone-block allograft 29 ± 24%, and of the marrow and connective tissue 27 ± 21%. Statistically significant histomorphometric differences regarding newly formed bone (69% vs. 31%, p = 0.05) were found between younger (< 45 years) and older (> 45 years) patients, respectively. Histomorphometric differences regarding residual cancellous bone-block allograft (17% vs. 35%) and of the marrow and connective tissue (14% vs. 34%) were not statistically significant. Cancellous bone-block allograft is biocompatible and osteoconductive, permitting new bone formation following augmentation of extremely atrophic posterior mandible with a two-stage implant placement procedure. New bone formation was age-dependent.
Copyright © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21509934     DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.33096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A        ISSN: 1549-3296            Impact factor:   4.396


  8 in total

1.  Histomorphometric and immunohistochemical evaluation of collagen containing xenogeneic bone blocks used for lateral bone augmentation in staged implant placement.

Authors:  Alberto Ortiz-Vigón; Sergio Martinez-Villa; Iñaki Suarez; Fabio Vignoletti; Mariano Sanz
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2017-06-21

2.  The effect of synthetic bone graft substitutes on bone formation in rabbit calvarial defects.

Authors:  Nikola Saulacic; Masako Fujioka-Kobayashi; Yasushi Kimura; Ava Insa Bracher; Claudio Zihlmann; Niklaus P Lang
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Customized Allogeneic Bone Augmentation Improves Esthetic Outcome in Anteromaxillary Dental Implantation.

Authors:  Manfred Nilius; Minou Hélène Nilius; Charlotte Mueller; Bernhard Weiland; Dominik Haim; Anna Krahe; Guenter Lauer
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2022-03-22

Review 4.  Horizontal augmentation techniques in the mandible: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ralf Smeets; Levi Matthies; Peter Windisch; Martin Gosau; Ronald Jung; Nadine Brodala; Martina Stefanini; Johannes Kleinheinz; Michael Payer; Anders Henningsen; Bilal Al-Nawas; Christian Knipfer
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2022-05-09

Review 5.  Success rate of implants placed in autogenous bone blocks versus allogenic bone blocks: A systematic literature review.

Authors:  Saeed Reza Motamedian; Moein Khojaste; Arash Khojasteh
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2016 Jan-Jun

6.  Comparison of allogeneic and autogenous bone grafts for augmentation of alveolar ridge defects-A 12-month retrospective radiographic evaluation.

Authors:  Frank R Kloss; Vincent Offermanns; Anita Kloss-Brandstätter
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 5.977

Review 7.  Horizontal Alveolar Ridge Augmentation with Allogeneic Bone Block Graft Compared with Autogenous Bone Block Graft: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Thomas Starch-Jensen; Daniel Deluiz; Eduardo Muniz Barretto Tinoco
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2020-03-31

8.  High Potential of Bacterial Adhesion on Block Bone Graft Materials.

Authors:  Themistoklis Nisyrios; Lamprini Karygianni; Tobias Fretwurst; Katja Nelson; Elmar Hellwig; Rainer Schmelzeisen; Ali Al-Ahmad
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 3.623

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.