Literature DB >> 21509231

Magnetic resonance pelvimetry for trial of labour after a previous caesarean section.

Vaidyanathan Gowri1, Rajeev Jain, Syed Rizvi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To stratify the magnetic resonance (MR) pelvimetric diameters according to mode of delivery and establish possible reference values for pelvic diameters and outlet index for trial of labor after a previous caesarean section.
METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 125 patients at Sultan Qaboos University Hospital who underwent MR pelvimetry prior to a trial of vaginal delivery after a previous caesarean section between May 2001 and October 2003. Sagittal inlet, Transverse inlet, interspinous diameter, sagittal outlet and transverse outlet diameters were measured in all patients. The mean diameters were stratified according to delivery modality (vaginal delivery or caesarean section). The outlet index (sum of interspinous, sagittal outlet and intertuberous diameters), biparietal diameter of the foetus and head circumference were compared in women who delivered by caesarean section or vaginally.
RESULTS: All the diameters except sagittal inlet, were significantly larger (P < 0.05) in women who delivered normally as compared with those who had a caesarean section for any indication. The mean outlet index in the spontaneous delivery group with vertex presentation 31.89 ± 2.05, was significantly larger than that of the elective and emergency caesarean section, which were 29.69 ± 1.85 &amp; 30.62 ± 1.80 respectively. The mean head circumference was also found to be significantly larger in the caesarean section deliveries.
CONCLUSION: An outlet index of 31.89 ± 2.05 and the pelvic diameters, transverse inlet 12.56 ± 0.80cm, sagittal outlet 10.54 ± 1.00 cm, interspinous diameter10.46 ± 0.89cm, and intertuberous diameter (transverse outlet) 10.89 ± 1.02cm are useful cut-off points for vaginal delivery in our population.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Caesarean section; Circumference; MRI; Normal values; Pelvimetry

Year:  2010        PMID: 21509231      PMCID: PMC3074700     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J        ISSN: 2075-051X


  13 in total

1.  Obstetric MR pelvimetry: reference values and evaluation of inter- and intraobserver error and intraindividual variability.

Authors:  Thomas M Keller; Annett Rake; Sven C A Michel; Burkhardt Seifert; Gul Efe; Karl Treiber; Renate Huch; Borut Marincek; Rahel A Kubik-Huch
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-02-11       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  MR imaging pelvimetry: a useful adjunct in the treatment of women at risk for dystocia?

Authors:  Stefan Spörri; Harriet C Thoeny; Luigi Raio; Remo Lachat; Peter Vock; Henning Schneider
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  MR pelvimetry--a practical alternative.

Authors:  A R Wright; P T English; H M Cameron; J B Wilsdon
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 1.990

Review 4.  Does Caesarean section cause infertility?

Authors:  Maureen Porter; Siladitya Bhattacharya; Edwin van Teijlingen; Allan Templeton
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  The cephalopelvic disproportion index. Combined fetal sonography and x-ray pelvimetry for early detection of cephalopelvic disproportion.

Authors:  M M Abitbol; U B Taylor; I Castillo; B L Rochelson
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 0.142

6.  Pelvimetry and breech delivery at term.

Authors:  S A Walkinshaw
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1997 Dec 20-27       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Pelvimetry by magnetic resonance imaging as a diagnostic tool to evaluate dystocia.

Authors:  S Spörri; W Hänggi; A Braghetti; P Vock; H Schneider
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  A review of pelvimetry data.

Authors:  J G Russell; B Richards
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1971-10       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Fetal shoulder measurements with MRI.

Authors:  B Kastler; A Gangi; C Mathelin; P Germain; J M Arhan; A Treisser; J L Dietemann; A Wackenheim
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1993 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.826

10.  Randomised controlled trial of magnetic-resonance pelvimetry in breech presentation at term.

Authors:  A J van Loon; A Mantingh; E K Serlier; G Kroon; E L Mooyaart; H J Huisjes
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1997 Dec 20-27       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  2 in total

1.  Labour and delivery: a clinician's perspective on a biomechanics problem.

Authors:  Helen Feltovich
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 3.906

2.  Establishment of an antepartum predictive scoring model to identify candidates for vaginal birth after cesarean.

Authors:  Qiuping Liao; Jinying Luo; Lianghui Zheng; Qing Han; Zhaodong Liu; Wei Qi; Tingting Yang; Jianying Yan
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 3.007

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.