Literature DB >> 21508915

Quality of life improved by multidisciplinary back school program in patıents with chronic non-specific low back pain: a single blind randomized controlled trial.

G Morone1, T Paolucci, M R Alcuri, M C Vulpiani, A Matano, I Bureca, S Paolucci, V M Saraceni.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A three and six months follow-up in a randomized controlled trial.
BACKGROUND: Back School has become a widespread exercise program for low back pain (LBP), since its introduction in 1969. Back School could improve quality of life (QoL), but there are controversial data regarding its effectiveness. AIM: To evaluate the effects of the Back School program on quality of life (primary outcome), disability and pain perceptions (secondary outcomes) in patients with chronic and non-specific low back pain.
SETTING: Rehabilitative specialized centre. POPULATION: Seventy four patients with chronic non-specific LBP.
METHODS: Patients were randomly placed in a 3:2 form and were allocated into 2 groups (treated-control). Treatment group participated in a intensive multidisciplinary Back School program including brief education and active back exercises (BSG, N.=41), while the control group received medical assistance (CG, N.=29). Medication was the same in both groups. The Short Form 36 Health Status Survey, Waddel Index, Oswestry Disability Index and Visual Analogue Scale were collected at baseline, at the end of treatment, and at the three and six month follow-up.
RESULTS: Quality of life significantly improved along time more in BSG, both in Physical and Mental Composite Score (repeated measure Anova: interaction time per group: P<0.001 and P=0.002, respectively). We also observed a significant improvement in disability scores along time (P<0.001) in BSG with significant differences between groups at three and at six months for Waddell Index (P=0.006 and P=0.009 respectively) and for Oswestry Disability Index (P=0.018 and 0.011 respectively). Moreover, pain perception score VAS showed a reduction in both groups, but it was significantly lower in BSG at end of treatment and both follow-ups (P<0.001).
CONCLUSION: Our Back School program can be considered an effective treatment in people with chronıc non-specıfıc LBP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21508915

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Phys Rehabil Med        ISSN: 1973-9087            Impact factor:   2.874


  12 in total

Review 1.  Back Schools for chronic non-specific low back pain.

Authors:  Patrícia Parreira; Martijn W Heymans; Maurits W van Tulder; Rosmin Esmail; Bart W Koes; Nolwenn Poquet; Chung-Wei Christine Lin; Christopher G Maher
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-08-03

Review 2.  [SCS as a treatment option for failed back surgery syndrome].

Authors:  V Tronnier
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 3.  Facet joint pain--advances in patient selection and treatment.

Authors:  Steven P Cohen; Julie H Y Huang; Chad Brummett
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 20.543

Review 4.  Exercise therapy for chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Jill A Hayden; Jenna Ellis; Rachel Ogilvie; Antti Malmivaara; Maurits W van Tulder
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-09-28

Review 5.  Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for chronic low back pain: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Steven J Kamper; A T Apeldoorn; A Chiarotto; R J E M Smeets; R W J G Ostelo; J Guzman; M W van Tulder
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2015-02-18

Review 6.  The effect of journal impact factor, reporting conflicts, and reporting funding sources, on standardized effect sizes in back pain trials: a systematic review and meta-regression.

Authors:  Robert Froud; Tom Bjørkli; Philip Bright; Dévan Rajendran; Rachelle Buchbinder; Martin Underwood; David Evans; Sandra Eldridge
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Effectiveness of the back school program for the performance of activities of daily living in users of a basic health unit in Porto Alegre, Brazil.

Authors:  Patrícia Thurow Bartz; Adriane Vieira; Matias Noll; Cláudia Tarragô Candotti
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2016-09-29

8.  Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for chronic low back pain: the need to present minimal important differences units in meta-analyses.

Authors:  Silvia Gianola; Anita Andreano; Greta Castellini; Lorenzo Moja; Maria Grazia Valsecchi
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 3.186

9.  Reducing lumbar spine flexion using real-time biofeedback during patient handling tasks.

Authors:  Mohammadhasan Owlia; Megan Kamachi; Tilak Dutta
Journal:  Work       Date:  2020

Review 10.  Back schools for the treatment of chronic low back pain: possibility of benefit but no convincing evidence after 47 years of research-systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sebastian Straube; Markus Harden; Heiko Schröder; Barbora Arendacka; Xiangning Fan; R Andrew Moore; Tim Friede
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 7.926

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.