Literature DB >> 215087

Comparative sensitivity of various cell culture systems for isolation of viruses from wastewater and fecal samples.

N J Schmidt, H H Ho, J L Riggs, E H Lennette.   

Abstract

In efforts to define the most sensitive cell culture systems for recovery of viruses from wastewaters, 181 samples were inoculated in parallel into tube cultures of various cell types and were plaqued in bottle and petri dish cultures of three types of monkey kidney cells. Polioviruses were recovered most frequently in the RD line of human rhabdomyosarcoma cells, group A coxsackieviruses in RD and human fetal diploid kidney (HFDK) cells, group B coxsackieviruses in the BGM line of African green monkey kidney cells, echoviruses in RD and primary rhesus monkey kidney (RhMK) cells, and reoviruses in RhMK cells. BGM cells were unsatisfactory for recovery of viruses other than polioviruses and group B coxsackieviruses, and a line of fetal rhesus monkey kidney (MFK) was not a satisfactory substitute for primary RhMK. With RhMK cells, comparable numbers of virus isolations were made in tube cultures and in plaque assays conducted in bottle cultures, but with BGM and MFK cells, fewer isolations were made by plaquing than by inoculation of tube cultures. In comparative plaque assays on fecal samples under three different overlays in bottle and plate cultures of RhMK, BGM, and MFK cells, it was found that plaquing in the most sensitive system, RhMK, was less efficient for virus recovery than was inoculation of tube cultures of RhMK or HFDK cells. Overall, plaque assays performed in petri dishes in a CO(2) incubator yielded fewer virus isolates than did parallel plaque assays performed in closed bottle cultures. Other limitations of plaque assays for recovery of human enteric viruses are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1978        PMID: 215087      PMCID: PMC243072          DOI: 10.1128/aem.36.3.480-486.1978

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  8 in total

1.  Propagation and isolation of group A coxsackieviruses in RD cells.

Authors:  N J Schmidt; H H Ho; E H Lennette
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  COMPARATIVE SENSITIVITY OF HUMAN FETAL DIPLOID KIDNEY CELL STRAINS AND MONKEY KIDNEY CELL CULTURES FOR ISOLATION OF CERTAIN HUMAN VIRUSES.

Authors:  N J SCHMIDT; E H LENNETTE; H H HO
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1965-04       Impact factor: 2.493

3.  Comparative sensitivity of the BGM cell line for isolation of enteric viruses.

Authors:  N J Schmidt; H H Ho; E H Lennette
Journal:  Health Lab Sci       Date:  1976-04

4.  BGM, a continuous cell line more sensitive than primary rhesus and African green kidney cells for the recovery of viruses from water.

Authors:  D R Dahling; G Berg; D Berman
Journal:  Health Lab Sci       Date:  1974-10

Review 5.  Tissue culture in the laboratory diagnosis of viral infections.

Authors:  N J Schmidt
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1972-06       Impact factor: 2.493

6.  Cultivation in vitro of cells derived from a human rhabdomyosarcoma.

Authors:  R M McAllister; J Melnyk; J Z Finkelstein; E C Adams; M B Gardner
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1969-09       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Characteristics of the BGM line of cells from African green monkey kidney. Brief report.

Authors:  A L Barron; C Olshevsky; M M Cohen
Journal:  Arch Gesamte Virusforsch       Date:  1970

8.  Mechanism of enhancement of virus plaques by cationic polymers.

Authors:  C Wallis; J L Melnick
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1968-04       Impact factor: 5.103

  8 in total
  25 in total

1.  Bioaccumulation and depuration of enteroviruses by the soft-shelled clam, Mya arenaria.

Authors:  T G Metcalf; B Mullin; D Eckerson; E Moulton; E P Larkin
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Increased Efficiency of Group B Coxsackievirus Isolation from Clinical Specimens by Use of BGM Cells.

Authors:  M A Menegus; G E Hollick
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Procedure for the recovery of airborne human enteric viruses during spray irrigation of treated wastewater.

Authors:  B E Moore; B P Sagik; C A Sorber
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Use of propidium monoazide in reverse transcriptase PCR to distinguish between infectious and noninfectious enteric viruses in water samples.

Authors:  Sandhya Parshionikar; Ian Laseke; G Shay Fout
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Presumptive identification of enteroviruses with RD, HEp-2, and RMK cell lines.

Authors:  S L Johnston; C S Siegel
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Enteroviruses in sludge: multiyear experience with four wastewater treatment plants.

Authors:  V V Hamparian; A C Ottolenghi; J H Hughes
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Optimization of the BGM cell line culture and viral assay procedures for monitoring viruses in the environment.

Authors:  D R Dahling; B A Wright
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Detection of enteroviruses in groundwater with the polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  M Abbaszadegan; M S Huber; C P Gerba; I L Pepper
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Trypsin-treated Ma-104: a sensitive cell line for isolating enteric viruses from environmental samples.

Authors:  F Agbalika; P Hartemann; J M Foliguet
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Induction of cytopathogenicity in mammalian cell lines challenged with culturable enteric viruses and its enhancement by 5-iododeoxyuridine.

Authors:  W H Benton; R L Ward
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.