Literature DB >> 21508144

A novel approach to the detection of acromegaly: accuracy of diagnosis by automatic face classification.

Harald J Schneider1, Robert P Kosilek, Manuel Günther, Josefine Roemmler, Günter K Stalla, Caroline Sievers, Martin Reincke, Jochen Schopohl, Rolf P Würtz.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: The delay between onset of first symptoms and diagnosis of the acromegaly is 6-10 yr. Acromegaly causes typical changes of the face that might be recognized by face classification software.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to assess classification accuracy of acromegaly by face-classification software.
DESIGN: This was a diagnostic study.
SETTING: The study was conducted in specialized care. PARTICIPANTS: Participants in the study included 57 patients with acromegaly (29 women, 28 men) and 60 sex- and age-matched controls.
INTERVENTIONS: We took frontal and side photographs of the faces and grouped patients into subjects with mild, moderate, and severe facial features of acromegaly by overall impression. We then analyzed all pictures using computerized similarity analysis based on Gabor jets and geometry functions. We used the leave-one-out cross-validation method to classify subjects by the software. Additionally, all subjects were classified by visual impression by three acromegaly experts and three general internists. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Classification accuracy by software, experts, and internists was measured.
FINDINGS: The software correctly classified 71.9% of patients and 91.5% of controls. Classification accuracy for patients by visual analysis was 63.2 and 42.1% by experts and general internists, respectively. Classification accuracy for controls was 80.8 and 87.0% by experts and internists, respectively. The highest differences in accuracy between software and experts and internists were present for patients with mild acromegaly.
CONCLUSIONS: Acromegaly can be detected by computer software using photographs of the face. Classification accuracy by software is higher than by medical experts or general internists, particularly in patients with mild features of acromegaly. This is a promising tool to help detecting acromegaly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21508144     DOI: 10.1210/jc.2011-0237

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab        ISSN: 0021-972X            Impact factor:   5.958


  23 in total

1.  Screening of acromegaly in adults with obstructive sleep apnea: is it worthwhile?

Authors:  Pierre Attal; Philippe Chanson
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 2.  The changing face of acromegaly--advances in diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Antônio Ribeiro-Oliveira; Ariel Barkan
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 43.330

3.  Three-dimensional facial analysis in acromegaly: a novel tool to quantify craniofacial characteristics after long-term remission.

Authors:  M A E M Wagenmakers; S H P P Roerink; T J J Maal; R H Pelleboer; J W A Smit; A R M M Hermus; S J Bergé; R T Netea-Maier; T Xi
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.107

4.  What Are Important Ethical Implications of Using Facial Recognition Technology in Health Care?

Authors:  Nicole Martinez-Martin
Journal:  AMA J Ethics       Date:  2019-02-01

Review 5.  Machine learning applications in imaging analysis for patients with pituitary tumors: a review of the current literature and future directions.

Authors:  Ashirbani Saha; Samantha Tso; Jessica Rabski; Alireza Sadeghian; Michael D Cusimano
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 4.107

6.  Clinical manifestations and diagnosis of acromegaly.

Authors:  Gloria Lugo; Lara Pena; Fernando Cordido
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 3.257

Review 7.  Progress in the Diagnosis and Classification of Pituitary Adenomas.

Authors:  Luis V Syro; Fabio Rotondo; Alex Ramirez; Antonio Di Ieva; Murat Aydin Sav; Lina M Restrepo; Carlos A Serna; Kalman Kovacs
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 5.555

Review 8.  Challenges in the diagnosis and management of acromegaly: a focus on comorbidities.

Authors:  Alin Abreu; Alejandro Pinzón Tovar; Rafael Castellanos; Alex Valenzuela; Claudia Milena Gómez Giraldo; Alejandro Castellanos Pinedo; Doly Pantoja Guerrero; Carlos Alfonso Builes Barrera; Humberto Ignacio Franco; Antônio Ribeiro-Oliveira; Lucio Vilar; Raquel S Jallad; Felipe Gaia Duarte; Mônica Gadelha; Cesar Luiz Boguszewski; Julio Abucham; Luciana A Naves; Nina Rosa C Musolino; Maria Estela Justamante de Faria; Ciliana Rossato; Marcello D Bronstein
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 4.107

Review 9.  The risks of overlooking the diagnosis of secreting pituitary adenomas.

Authors:  Thierry Brue; Frederic Castinetti
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 4.123

Review 10.  Implementing a screening program for acromegaly in Latin America: necessity versus feasibility.

Authors:  Karina Danilowicz; Patricia Fainstein Day; Marcos P Manavela; Carlos Javier Herrera; María Laura Deheza; Gabriel Isaac; Ariel Juri; Debora Katz; Oscar D Bruno
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 4.107

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.