Literature DB >> 21508001

Aortic root geometry in aortic stenosis patients (a SEAS substudy).

Edda Bahlmann1, Christoph A Nienaber, Dana Cramariuc, Christa Gohlke-Baerwolf, Simon Ray, Richard B Devereux, Kristian Wachtell, Karl Heinz Kuck, Einar Davidsen, Eva Gerdts.   

Abstract

AIMS: To report aortic root geometry by echocardiography in a large population of healthy, asymptomatic aortic stenosis (AS) patients in relation to current vendor-specified requirements for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). METHODS AND
RESULTS: Baseline data in 1481 patients with asymptomatic AS (mean age 67 years, 39% women) in the Simvastatin Ezetimibe in AS study were used. The inner aortic diameter was measured at four levels: annulus, sinus of Valsalva, sinotubular junction and supracoronary, and sinus height as the annulo-junctional distance. Analyses were based on vendor-specified requirements for the aortic root geometry for current available prostheses, CoreValve and Edwards-Sapien. The ratio of sinus of Valsalva height to sinus width was 1:2. In multivariate linear regression analysis, larger sinus of Valsalva height was associated with older age, larger sinus of Valsalva diameter, lower ejection fraction and smaller supracoronary diameter (multiple R(2) = 0.19, P< 0.01). The required annulus diameter for implantation of CoreValve was met in 61.9%, and for the Edwards-Sapien prosthesis in 66.9%. Overall, annular dimension feasible for TAVI using any available prosthesis was found in 78.2% of patients and in 77.7% of patients also the required minimum sinus of Valsalva height was found. Comparing the group of patients who met TAVI requirements to those who did not, the latter included more women and patients with lower body height and weight and significantly smaller aortic root diameters (all P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Among AS patients in the SEAS study, 27% of women and 19% of men did not have aortic root geometry fulfilling current requirements for TAVI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21508001     DOI: 10.1093/ejechocard/jer037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Echocardiogr        ISSN: 1532-2114


  5 in total

Review 1.  Computed tomography in the evaluation for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).

Authors:  Paul Schoenhagen; Jörg Hausleiter; Stephan Achenbach; Milind Y Desai; E Murat Tuzcu
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2011-12

Review 2.  Transcatheter aortic valve repair, imaging, and electronic imaging health record.

Authors:  Paul Schoenhagen; Juergen Falkner; David Piraino
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Comparison of the geometry of the left ventricle outflow tract, the aortic root and the ascending aorta in patients with severe tricuspid aortic stenosis versus healthy controls.

Authors:  Małgorzata Nieznańska; Karina Zatorska; Patrycjusz Stokłosa; Małgorzata Ryś; Piotr Duchnowski; Piotr Szymański; Tomasz Hryniewiecki; Ilona Michałowska
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Non-invasive determination of pressure recovery by cardiac MRI and echocardiography in patients with severe aortic stenosis: short and long-term outcome prediction.

Authors:  Florian Sagmeister; Sebastian Herrmann; Tobias Gassenmaier; Peter Bernhardt; Volker Rasche; Andreas Liebold; Frank Weidemann; Horst Brunner; Meinrad Beer
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 1.671

5.  Global left ventricular load in asymptomatic aortic stenosis: covariates and prognostic implication (the SEAS trial).

Authors:  Ashild E Rieck; Eva Gerdts; Mai Tone Lønnebakken; Edda Bahlmann; Giovanni Cioffi; Christa Gohlke-Bärwolf; Simon Ray; Dana Cramariuc
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2012-11-05       Impact factor: 2.062

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.