Literature DB >> 21507893

Subjective judgements in scientific practice and art.

Enrique Regidor1.   

Abstract

Since art and science went their separate ways in the 18th century, the purpose of science has been to generate true knowledge based on reason and objectivity. However, during the second half of the 20th century, opinions emerged within science that showed the impossibility of eliminating subjectivity in scientific practice. This paper describes the similarity of the subjective judgements that form part of the peer-review system-the method devised by the scientific community to guarantee truth and objectivity-and the subjective judgements involved in artistic evaluation.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21507893     DOI: 10.1136/jech.2009.094680

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health        ISSN: 0143-005X            Impact factor:   3.710


  1 in total

1.  Peer review of grant applications: criteria used and qualitative study of reviewer practices.

Authors:  Hendy Abdoul; Christophe Perrey; Philippe Amiel; Florence Tubach; Serge Gottot; Isabelle Durand-Zaleski; Corinne Alberti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.