Literature DB >> 21507689

A comparison of salivary substitutes versus a natural sialogogue (citric acid) in patients complaining of dry mouth as an adverse drug reaction: a clinical, randomized controlled study.

Felice Femiano1, Rosario Rullo, Federica di Spirito, Alessandro Lanza, Vincenzo Maria Festa, Nicola Cirillo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare the efficacy of saliva substitutes and citric acid long-term therapy for oral dryness relief and unstimulated salivary flow in patients reporting drug-induced xerostomia. STUDY
DESIGN: Fifty-four patients reporting drug-induced xerostomia were randomly subdivided into 3 groups and respectively administered artificial saliva, 3% citric acid, or distilled water in mouthwash 4 times a day for 30 days. Patients underwent measurement of unstimulated whole saliva before and after they finished therapy and were asked to note in a daily diary any symptomatologic changes 15 minutes and 1 hour after each daily intake of test solution.
RESULTS: Fifteen minutes after solution intake, 12 patients (67%) belonging to the artificial saliva group, 9 (50%) from the citric acid group, and 2 (11%) from the water group reported significant symptomatologic improvement. One hour after solution intake, 7 patients (39%) from the artificial saliva group, 10 (56%) from the citric acid group, and 0 from the water group noted significant symptomatologic improvement. None of the drugs tested affected unstimulated whole saliva flow.
CONCLUSIONS: Both artificial saliva and citric acid provided immediate relief from oral dryness. Citric acid also provided a longer-lasting feeling of oral moistness at 1 hour after use owing to its protracted activity on salivary gland function.
Copyright © 2011 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21507689     DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.01.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod        ISSN: 1079-2104


  8 in total

1.  Comparison between three different saliva substitutes in patients with hyposalivation.

Authors:  Ivana Skrinjar; Vanja Vucicevic Boras; Iva Bakale; Ana Andabak Rogulj; Vlaho Brailo; Danica Vidovic Juras; Ivan Alajbeg; Danko Velimir Vrdoljak
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-01-25       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  The effect of saliva substitute on the color stability of three different nanocomposite restorative materials after 1 month: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Amulya Vittal Rai; Balaram Damodar Naik
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2021-07-05

Review 3.  Efficacy of Artificial Salivary Substitutes in Treatment of Xerostomia: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Mansour K A Assery
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2019-02

4.  Endogenous salivary citrate is associated with enhanced rheological properties following oral capsaicin stimulation.

Authors:  Alexander Gardner; Po-Wah So; Guy Carpenter
Journal:  Exp Physiol       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 2.969

Review 5.  A Review on Xerostomia and Its Various Management Strategies: The Role of Advanced Polymeric Materials in the Treatment Approaches.

Authors:  Afroditi Kapourani; Konstantinos N Kontogiannopoulos; Alexandra-Eleftheria Manioudaki; Athanasios K Poulopoulos; Lazaros Tsalikis; Andreana N Assimopoulou; Panagiotis Barmpalexis
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 4.329

6.  Chlorhexidine Mucoadhesive Buccal Tablets: The Impact of Formulation Design on Drug Delivery and Release Kinetics Using Conventional and Novel Dissolution Methods.

Authors:  Enas Al-Ani; David Hill; Khalid Doudin
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-23

Review 7.  Treatment of xerostomia and hyposalivation in the elderly: A systematic review.

Authors:  J-A Gil-Montoya; F-J Silvestre; R Barrios; J Silvestre-Rangil
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2016-05-01

8.  An ex vivo salivary lubrication system to mimic xerostomic conditions and to predict the lubricating properties of xerostomia relieving agents.

Authors:  Jeroen Vinke; Hans J Kaper; Arjan Vissink; Prashant K Sharma
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.