Literature DB >> 21507524

Inappropriate intravascular device use: a prospective study.

M M Tiwari1, E D Hermsen, M E Charlton, J R Anderson, M E Rupp.   

Abstract

Despite the clinical significance of complications due to intravascular catheters, the inappropriate use of intravascular catheters in hospitalised patients has not been adequately characterised. The objective of this prospective observational study was to develop definitions for appropriate intravascular device use, to estimate the frequency of inappropriate use of intravascular devices, and to examine risk factors and outcomes associated with inappropriate use in hospitalised patients. Among 436 patients admitted between October and December 2007, a total of 2909 hospitalisation days and use of 876 intravascular devices was observed. Of the 3806 total catheter-days recorded, 1179 (31%) were found to be inappropriate based on the study criteria. Logistic regression analysis indicated that age, total number of catheters used and total duration of catheterisation were risk factors for inappropriate device use (P<0.05). Inappropriate usage was strongly associated with increased intensive care unit admission (P<0.05) and length of hospital stay (4.9±4.3 days for appropriate vs 8.5±12.6 days for inappropriate; P<0.05). Use of central venous catheters was not a predictor for inappropriate device use. Inappropriate intravascular device use is a very common phenomenon in hospitalised patients and is strongly linked to adverse device-related outcomes. These results may be used to develop strategies to systematically reduce excessive intravascular device use which would be expected to reduce adverse events associated with morbidity, mortality, and excess healthcare costs.
Copyright © 2011 The Healthcare Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21507524     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2011.03.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hosp Infect        ISSN: 0195-6701            Impact factor:   3.926


  4 in total

1.  Do clinicians know which of their patients have central venous catheters?: a multicenter observational study.

Authors:  Vineet Chopra; Sushant Govindan; Latoya Kuhn; David Ratz; Randy F Sweis; Natalie Melin; Rachel Thompson; Aaron Tolan; James Barron; Sanjay Saint
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Effectiveness of a training program in compliance with recommendations for venous lines care.

Authors:  M J Pérez-Granda; M Guembe; C Rincón; P Muñoz; E Bouza
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 3.090

3.  Epidemiology and impact of a multifaceted approach in controlling central venous catheter associated blood stream infections outside the intensive care unit.

Authors:  José Francisco García-Rodríguez; Hortensia Álvarez-Díaz; Laura Vilariño-Maneiro; María Virginia Lorenzo-García; Ana Cantón-Blanco; Patricia Ordoñez-Barrosa; Ana Isabel Mariño-Callejo; Pascual Sesma-Sánchez
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 3.090

4.  Tissue adhesives to secure peripheral intravenous catheters: A randomized controlled trial in patients over 65 years.

Authors:  Uğur Özkula; Ayhan Özhasenekler; Gülhan Kurtoğlu Çelik; Fatih Tanrıverdi; Gül Pamukçu Günaydın; Mehmet Ergin; Çağdaş Yıldırım; Şervan Gökhan
Journal:  Turk J Emerg Med       Date:  2018-08-23
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.