Literature DB >> 21507189

Critical assessment of the European Association of Urology guideline indications for pelvic lymph node dissection at radical prostatectomy.

Firas Abdollah1, Maxine Sun, Alberto Briganti, Rodolphe Thuret, Jan Schmitges, Andrea Gallina, Nazareno Suardi, Umberto Capitanio, Andrea Salonia, Shahrokh F Shariat, Paul Perrotte, Patrizio Rigatti, Francesco Montorsi, Pierre I Karakiewicz.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Lymphadenectomy is the most accurate lymph node staging procedure in patients with prostate cancer. We presented the first formal validation of the 2010 European Association of Urology guidelines for lymphadenectomy in prostate cancer patients.
OBJECTIVE: • To assess the 2010 European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines for prostate cancer, which recommend a pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) at radical prostatectomy in all individuals with a nomogram-predicted lymph node invasion (LNI) risk of >7%. PATIENTS AND METHODS: • We focused on 1520 patients treated with radical prostatectomy and PLND, between 2006 and 2010, at a single European institution. We examined the ability of the EAU proposed threshold to correctly predict histologically confirmed LNI. Moreover, we tested the ability of a range of nomogram thresholds between 1 and 14% to correctly predict histologically confirmed LNI. Finally, we externally validated the EAU PLND guideline nomogram.
RESULTS: • Overall, 10.6% of patients had LNI. The use of the 7% limit would have allowed the avoidance of 49% of PLNDs, at the cost of missing 11% of patients with LNI. The use of thresholds of 6% and 8% would have allowed the avoidance of respectively 46% and 52% of PLNDs, at the cost of missing respectively 9% and 11% of patients with LNI. Overall, the accuracy of the EAU guideline nomogram according to the receiver operating characteristics derived area under curve was 81%
CONCLUSION: • Our observations indicate that the EAU guideline nomogram is highly accurate. The recommended threshold of 7%, above which a PLND should be performed, is associated with a favourable compromise between avoidable PLNDs and potentially missed LNI cases.
© 2011 THE AUTHORS. BJU INTERNATIONAL © 2011 BJU INTERNATIONAL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21507189     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10204.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  4 in total

1.  Histological step sectioning of pelvic lymph nodes increases the number of identified lymph node metastases.

Authors:  Birte Engvad; Mads H Poulsen; Pia W Staun; Steen Walter; Niels Marcussen
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  Multicenter evaluation of guideline adherence for pelvic lymph node dissection in patients undergoing open retropubic vs. laparoscopic or robot assisted radical prostatectomy according to the recent German S3 guideline on prostate cancer.

Authors:  Angelika Borkowetz; Johannes Bruendl; Martin Drerup; Jonas Herrmann; Hendrik Isbarn; Burkhard Beyer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Does anterior prostatic fat tissue removed during robotic radical prostatectomy contain any lymph nodes?

Authors:  Ali Fuat Atmaca; Abdullah Erdem Canda; Murat Keske; Muhammed Ersagun Arslan; Davut Kamaci; Erdal Alkan; Mevlana Derya Balbay
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2015-12-21

4.  Head-to-Head Comparison of Two Nomograms Predicting Probability of Lymph Node Invasion in Prostate Cancer and the Therapeutic Impact of Higher Nomogram Threshold.

Authors:  Zilvinas Venclovas; Tim Muilwijk; Aivaras J Matjosaitis; Mindaugas Jievaltas; Steven Joniau; Daimantas Milonas
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 4.241

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.