Literature DB >> 21507187

Patient acceptance of active surveillance as a treatment option for low-risk prostate cancer.

B Joyce Davison1, S Larry Goldenberg.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Active surveillance is a management strategy that offers patients the hope of avoiding the side effects associated with unnecessary treatment. This study identifies the resources required by men who choose to be on active surveillance to support them in their treatment decision.
OBJECTIVES: •  To examine the decision-making processes of men on active surveillance (AS). •  To identify the resources that men want to access to make, support and sustain them while on AS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: •  Three-part survey developed for this study based on a qualitative study of 25 men on AS. •  Survey items explored: role men assumed with their physician in treatment decision-making, factors influencing decision to go on AS, and resources required while on AS. •  Surveys mailed out to cross-sectional sample of men on AS for less than 10 years.
RESULTS: •  27% of the 73 men reported assuming an active role in treatment decision-making with their urologist, 41% a shared role and 32% a passive role. •  82% of men reported being comfortable and 90% being satisfied with their decision to be on AS. •  55% reported not being anxious about the cancer progressing while on AS. •  Urologist's opinion, current age, and impact of treatment on urinary function were main factors influencing treatment decision. •  Information on future treatment options, non-traditional treatments and diet considered most important resources.
CONCLUSIONS: •  Results suggest that once men make a decision to go on AS, they are satisfied with their decision and few report being anxious about progression of cancer. •  Men are strongly influenced by the treating specialist in taking up AS. •  Additional information and psychological support resources are required for men on AS.
© 2011 THE AUTHORS. BJU INTERNATIONAL © 2011 BJU INTERNATIONAL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21507187     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10200.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  27 in total

1.  Decision-making processes among men with low-risk prostate cancer: A survey study.

Authors:  Richard M Hoffman; Stephen K Van Den Eeden; Kimberly M Davis; Tania Lobo; George Luta; Jun Shan; David Aaronson; David F Penson; Amethyst D Leimpeter; Kathryn L Taylor
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 2.  Fear of cancer recurrence in adult cancer survivors: a systematic review of quantitative studies.

Authors:  Sébastien Simard; Belinda Thewes; Gerry Humphris; Mélanie Dixon; Ceara Hayden; Shab Mireskandari; Gozde Ozakinci
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2013-03-10       Impact factor: 4.442

3.  Selecting Active Surveillance: Decision Making Factors for Men with a Low-Risk Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Richard M Hoffman; Tania Lobo; Stephen K Van Den Eeden; Kimberly M Davis; George Luta; Amethyst D Leimpeter; David Aaronson; David F Penson; Kathryn Taylor
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 2.583

4.  Factors influencing patients' acceptance and adherence to active surveillance.

Authors:  David F Penson
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2012-12

5.  Active surveillance for prostate cancer: an underutilized opportunity for reducing harm.

Authors:  H Ballentine Carter
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2012-12

6.  Racial Differences in Treatment Decision-Making for Men with Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: a Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Jinping Xu; James Janisse; Julie Ruterbusch; Joel Ager; Kendra L Schwartz
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2015-05-05

7.  Factors Influencing Men's Choice of and Adherence to Active Surveillance for Low-risk Prostate Cancer: A Mixed-method Systematic Review.

Authors:  Netty Kinsella; Pär Stattin; Declan Cahill; Christian Brown; Anna Bill-Axelson; Ola Bratt; Sigrid Carlsson; Mieke Van Hemelrijck
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  The effect of urologist experience on choosing active surveillance for prostate cancer.

Authors:  William G Chu; Brian J Kim; Jeff Slezak; Teresa N Harrison; Joy Gelfond; Steven J Jacobsen; Gary W Chien
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Patient preference and the impact of decision-making aids on prostate cancer treatment choices and post-intervention regret.

Authors:  J J Aning; R J Wassersug; S L Goldenberg
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.677

10.  Informational needs during active surveillance for prostate cancer: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Stacy Loeb; Caitlin Curnyn; Angela Fagerlin; R Scott Braithwaite; Mark D Schwartz; Herbert Lepor; H Ballentine Carter; Shannon Ciprut; Erica Sedlander
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2017-09-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.