Literature DB >> 21507149

fMRI and MEG analysis of visceral pain in healthy volunteers.

J K Smith1, D J Humes, K E Head, D Bush, T P White, C M Stevenson, M J Brookes, L Marciani, R C Spiller, P A Gowland, S T Francis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although many studies of painful rectal stimulation have found activation in the insula, cingulate, somatosensory, prefrontal cortices and thalamus, there is considerable variability when comparing functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) results. Multiple factors may be responsible, including the model used in fMRI data analysis. Here, we assess the temporal response of activity to rectal barostat distension using novel fMRI and magnetoencephalography (MEG) analysis.
METHODS: Liminal and painful rectal barostat balloon inflation thresholds were assessed in 14 female healthy volunteers. Subliminal, liminal and painful 40s periods of distension were applied in a pseudo-randomized paradigm during fMRI and MEG neuroimaging. Functional MRI data analysis was performed comparing standard box-car models of the full 40s of stimulus (Block) with models of the inflation (Ramp-On) and deflation (Ramp-Off) of the barostat. Similar models were used in MEG analysis of oscillatory activity. KEY
RESULTS: Modeling the data using a standard Block analysis failed to detect areas of interest found to be active using Ramp-On and Ramp-Off models. Ramp-On generated activity in anterior insula and cingulate regions and other pain-matrix associated areas. Ramp-Off demonstrated activity of a network of posterior insula, SII and posterior cingulate. Active areas were consistent with those identified from MEG data. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: In studies of visceral pain, fMRI model design strongly influences the detected activity and must be accounted for to effectively explore the fMRI data in healthy subjects and within patient groups. In particular a strong cortical response is detected to inflation and deflation of the barostat, rather than to its absolute volume.
© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21507149     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2011.01712.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil        ISSN: 1350-1925            Impact factor:   3.598


  7 in total

Review 1.  Review of overlap between thermoregulation and pain modulation in fibromyalgia.

Authors:  Alice A Larson; José V Pardo; Jeffrey D Pasley
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.442

Review 2.  Neuroanatomy of lower gastrointestinal pain disorders.

Authors:  Wim Vermeulen; Joris G De Man; Paul A Pelckmans; Benedicte Y De Winter
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Towards a neurophysiological signature for fibromyalgia.

Authors:  Marina López-Solà; Choong-Wan Woo; Jesus Pujol; Joan Deus; Ben J Harrison; Jordi Monfort; Tor D Wager
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 7.926

Review 4.  Regions of the brain activated in bladder filling vs rectal distention in healthy adults: A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies.

Authors:  Priyanka Kadam Halani; Uduak U Andy; Hengyi Rao; Lily A Arya
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 2.367

5.  Subliminal versus supraliminal stimuli activate neural responses in anterior cingulate cortex, fusiform gyrus and insula: a meta-analysis of fMRI studies.

Authors:  Paolo Meneguzzo; Manos Tsakiris; Helgi B Schioth; Dan J Stein; Samantha J Brooks
Journal:  BMC Psychol       Date:  2014-12-11

6.  Anticipation of thermal pain in diverticular disease.

Authors:  J K Smith; L Marciani; D J Humes; S T Francis; P Gowland; R C Spiller
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 3.598

7.  FMRP acts as a key messenger for visceral pain modulation.

Authors:  Liu-Kun Yang; Liang Lu; Ban Feng; Xin-Shang Wang; Jiao Yue; Xu-Bo Li; Min Zhuo; Shui-Bing Liu
Journal:  Mol Pain       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.395

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.