Literature DB >> 21506858

Processes influencing the duration and decline of epizootics in Schistocephalus solidus.

David C Heins1, John A Baker, Dillon M Green.   

Abstract

The interplay of intermediate host fish and plerocercoids of diphyllobothriidean cestodes results in epizootics that are deceptively simple, but conceal complex biotic and abiotic interactions shaping each event independently. Although general descriptions of epizootics and some details of biotic interactions between enemies are known, much remains to be discovered about the abiotic and biotic forces and their interactions driving epizootics. This study shows that the duration of an epizootic of Schistocephalus solidus was sustained by high prevalence, mean intensity, and PI (parasite index-parasite : host biomass ratio) levels among young-of-the-year and 1-yr-old threespine sticklebacks. Many infections and most parasite growth in young-of-the-year fish apparently occurred under the ice during the winter. Few new infections appear to have occurred among 1-yr-old fish, which may live 2 yr and sometimes 3 yr. The decline of the epizootic occurred as the recruitment of 1 to 2-yr-old hosts decreased significantly, followed by reduced infections of young-of-the-year fish. Thus, a major factor influencing parasite population dynamics was reduced transmission (probability of infection) as a result of overwinter host mortality among 1-yr-old fish. Mega-epizootics, named and described herein, appear to represent a "perfect storm" phenomenon dependent on a particular and rare combination of circumstances. Less extreme and more gradual epizootics may be more common and play out in myriad ways, because of complex abiotic and biotic factors influencing both parasite and host populations. The interplay of parasite and host resulting in reciprocal effects upon one another occurs during both the emergence and decline phases of an epizootic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21506858     DOI: 10.1645/GE-2699.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Parasitol        ISSN: 0022-3395            Impact factor:   1.276


  4 in total

1.  Stickleback mass occurrence driven by spatially uneven parasite pressure? Insights into infection dynamics, host mortality, and epizootic variability.

Authors:  Jan Baer; Sarah M Gugele; Samuel Roch; Alexander Brinker
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 2.383

2.  Competition and Facilitation between a Disease and a Predator in a Stunted Prey Population.

Authors:  Maarten C Boerlijst; André M de Roos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Scale-dependent effects of host patch traits on species composition in a stickleback parasite metacommunity.

Authors:  Daniel I Bolnick; Emlyn J Resetarits; Kimberly Ballare; Yoel E Stuart; William E Stutz
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 5.499

4.  An experimental conflict of interest between parasites reveals the mechanism of host manipulation.

Authors:  Nina Hafer; Manfred Milinski
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 2.671

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.