Literature DB >> 21506066

Post-operative infection after minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): literature review and cost analysis.

S L Parker1, O Adogwa, T F Witham, O S Aaronson, J Cheng, M J McGirt.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Surgical site infection (SSI) in the setting of lumbar fusion is associated with significant morbidity and medical resource utilization. To date, there have been no studies conducted with sufficient power to directly compare the incidence of SSI following minimally invasive (MIS) vs. open TLIF procedures. Furthermore, studies are lacking that quantify the direct medical cost of SSI following fusion procedures. We set out to determine the incidence of SSI in patients undergoing MIS vs. open TLIF reported in the literature and to determine the direct hospital cost associated with the treatment of SSI following TLIF at our institution.
METHODS: A systematic Medline search was performed to identify all published studies assessing SSI after MIS or open TLIF. The cumulative incidence of SSI was calculated from all reported cohorts and compared between MIS vs. open TLIF. In order to determine the direct hospital costs associated with the treatment of SSI following TLIF, we retrospectively reviewed 120 consecutive TLIFs performed at our institution, assessed the incidence of SSI, and calculated the SSI-related hospital costs from accounting and billing records.
RESULTS: To date, there have been 10 MIS-TLIF cohorts (362 patients) and 20 open-TLIF cohorts (1 133 patients) reporting incidences of SSI. The cumulative incidence of reported SSI was significantly lower for MIS vs. open-TLIF (0.6% vs. 4.0%, p=0.0005). In our experience with 120 open TLIF procedures, SSI occurred in 6 (5.0%) patients. The mean hospital cost associated with the treatment of SSI following TLIF was $ 29,110 in these 6 cases. The 3.4% decrease in reported incidence of SSI for MIS vs. open-TLIF corresponds to a direct cost savings of $ 98,974 per 100 MIS-TLIF procedures performed.
CONCLUSIONS: Post-operative wound infections following TLIF are costly complications. MIS vs. open TLIF is associated with a decreased reported incidence of SSI in the literature and may be a valuable tool in reducing hospital costs associated with spine care. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21506066     DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1269904

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Minim Invasive Neurosurg        ISSN: 0946-7211


  42 in total

Review 1.  Postoperative infections of the lumbar spine: presentation and management.

Authors:  Dennis S Meredith; Christopher K Kepler; Russel C Huang; Barry D Brause; Oheneba Boachie-Adjei
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-12-10       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis grades 1-2: patient-reported clinical outcomes and cost-utility analysis.

Authors:  Wale A R Sulaiman; Manish Singh
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2014

Review 3.  Visceral, vascular, and wound complications following over 13,000 lateral interbody fusions: a survey study and literature review.

Authors:  Juan S Uribe; Armen R Deukmedjian
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Is MIS-TLIF superior to open TLIF in obese patients?: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jun Hao Tan; Gabriel Liu; Ruimin Ng; Nishant Kumar; Hee-Kit Wong; Gabriel Liu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Minimally invasive versus open surgery for the correction of adult degenerative scoliosis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Asad M Lak; Nayan Lamba; Farrah Pompilus; Ismaeel Yunusa; Andrella King; Ihtisham Sultan; James Amamoo; Nawaf M Al-Otaibi; Mohammed Alasmari; Iman Zaghloul; Linda Aglio; Christian D Cerecedo-Lopez; Ian Tafel; Timothy R Smith; Rania A Mekary; Hasan Zaidi
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 6.  Impact of spine surgery complications on costs associated with management of adult spinal deformity.

Authors:  Samrat Yeramaneni; Chessie Robinson; Richard Hostin
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-09

7.  Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Islam M Elboghdady; Abbas Naqvi; Anton Y Jorgenson; Alejandro Marquez-Lara; Kern Singh
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2014-10

Review 8.  [The PLIF and TLIF techniques. Indication, technique, advantages, and disadvantages].

Authors:  C Fleege; M Rickert; M Rauschmann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.087

9.  Comparison of bilateral versus unilateral decompression incision of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in two-level degenerative lumbar diseases.

Authors:  Yongzhao Zhao; Yanjie Zhu; Hailong Zhang; Chuanfeng Wang; Shisheng He; Guangfei Gu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-05-13       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 10.  [Infections after reconstructive spinal interventions : How do I deal with them?]

Authors:  Burkhard Lehner; Michael Akbar; Nicholas A Beckmann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.087

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.