Literature DB >> 21505912

Reviewing manuscripts for peer-review journals: a primer for novice and seasoned reviewers.

Travis I Lovejoy1, Tracey A Revenson, Christopher R France.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The importance of peer review in the furthering of science cannot be overstated. However, most doctoral students and early career professionals receive little formal or informal training in conducting peer reviews.
PURPOSE: In recognition of this deficit in peer reviewer training, the present article was developed to provide an overview of the peer-review process at Annals of Behavioral Medicine and describe the general and specific elements that should be included in a high-quality review for the journal.
CONCLUSION: We conclude by offering exemplar reviews of a manuscript that was ultimately accepted for publication in the journal and provide commentary on specific aspects of these reviews.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21505912     DOI: 10.1007/s12160-011-9269-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Behav Med        ISSN: 0883-6612


  18 in total

1.  The ethics of peer review in bioethics.

Authors:  David Wendler; Franklin Miller
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Reviewing manuscripts for the Journal of Genetic Counseling: practical suggestions.

Authors:  Vickie Venne
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-12-21       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Becoming a peer reviewer: engaging in sharing and gaining knowledge.

Authors:  Vivian R Ramsden; Nicholas Pimlott; Robert Woollard; Brent Kvern; Curtis Handford; Lynn Dunikowski; Suzanne Gagnon; Kaili Hoffart; Roger Ladouceur; Yves Lambert
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Predatory publishing, questionable peer review, and fraudulent conferences.

Authors:  John D Bowman
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 2.047

5.  Ensuring the Quality, Fairness, and Integrity of Journal Peer Review: A Possible Role of Editors.

Authors:  David B Resnik; Susan A Elmore
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 3.525

6.  Editors' Perspectives on Enhancing Manuscript Quality and Editorial Decisions Through Peer Review and Reviewer Development.

Authors:  Kristin K Janke; Andrew S Bzowyckyj; Andrew P Traynor
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.047

7.  Reviews, reviewers and reviewing.

Authors:  Ancuţa Zazgyva; Elizaveta Kon; Cyril Mauffrey; Andreas F Mavrogenis; Marius M Scarlat
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Reviewing the review process: Identifying sources of delay.

Authors:  J Lotriet Cornelius
Journal:  Australas Med J       Date:  2012-01-31

9.  Preparing tomorrow's behavioral medicine scientists and practitioners: a survey of future directions for education and training.

Authors:  Carly M Goldstein; Karl E Minges; Danielle E Schoffman; Mallory G Cases
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2016-06-30

10.  A proton nuclear magnetic resonance-based metabonomics study of metabolic profiling in immunoglobulin a nephropathy.

Authors:  Weiguo Sui; Liping Li; Wenti Che; Zuo Guimai; Jiejing Chen; Wuxian Li; Yong Dai
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.365

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.