Literature DB >> 21505411

Measurement of aggregate cohesion by tissue surface tensiometry.

Christine M Butler1, Ramsey A Foty.   

Abstract

Rigorous measurement of intercellular binding energy can only be made using methods grounded in thermodynamic principles in systems at equilibrium. We have developed tissue surface tensiometry (TST) specifically to measure the surface free energy of interaction between cells. The biophysical concepts underlying TST have been previously described in detail. The method is based on the observation that mutually cohesive cells, if maintained in shaking culture, will spontaneously assemble into clusters. Over time, these clusters will round up to form spheres. This rounding-up behavior mimics the behavior characteristic of liquid systems. Intercellular binding energy is measured by compressing spherical aggregates between parallel plates in a custom-designed tissue surface tensiometer. The same mathematical equation used to measure the surface tension of a liquid droplet is used to measure surface tension of 3D tissue-like spherical aggregates. The cellular equivalent of liquid surface tension is intercellular binding energy, or more generally, tissue cohesivity. Previous studies from our laboratory have shown that tissue surface tension (1) predicts how two groups of embryonic cells will interact with one another, (2) can strongly influence the ability of tissues to interact with biomaterials, (3) can be altered not only through direct manipulation of cadherin-based intercellular cohesion, but also by manipulation of key ECM molecules such as FN and 4) correlates with invasive potential of lung cancer, fibrosarcoma, brain tumor and prostate tumor cell lines. In this article we will describe the apparatus, detail the steps required to generate spheroids, to load the spheroids into the tensiometer chamber, to initiate aggregate compression, and to analyze and validate the tissue surface tension measurements generated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21505411      PMCID: PMC3169255          DOI: 10.3791/2739

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


  16 in total

1.  Tissue spreading on implantable substrates is a competitive outcome of cell-cell vs. cell-substratum adhesivity.

Authors:  P L Ryan; R A Foty; J Kohn; M S Steinberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-03-27       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Liquid properties of embryonic tissues: Measurement of interfacial tensions.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  1994-04-04       Impact factor: 9.161

3.  Aspiration of biological viscoelastic drops.

Authors:  Karine Guevorkian; Marie-Josée Colbert; Mélanie Durth; Sylvie Dufour; Françoise Brochard-Wyart
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 9.161

4.  Biophysical measurement of brain tumor cohesion.

Authors:  Brian S Winters; Scott R Shepard; Ramsey A Foty
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2005-04-10       Impact factor: 7.396

5.  The differential adhesion hypothesis: a direct evaluation.

Authors:  Ramsey A Foty; Malcolm S Steinberg
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2005-02-01       Impact factor: 3.582

6.  Tissue surface tensions guide in vitro self-assembly of rodent pancreatic islet cells.

Authors:  Dongxuan Jia; Daniel Dajusta; Ramsey A Foty
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.780

7.  Measurement of tumor cell cohesion and suppression of invasion by E- or P-cadherin.

Authors:  R A Foty; M S Steinberg
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1997-11-15       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Role of cell shape in growth control.

Authors:  J Folkman; A Moscona
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1978-06-01       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Three-dimensional culture regulates Raf-1 expression to modulate fibronectin matrix assembly.

Authors:  B S Winters; B K Mohan Raj; E E Robinson; R A Foty; S A Corbett
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2006-05-17       Impact factor: 4.138

10.  Surface tensions of embryonic tissues predict their mutual envelopment behavior.

Authors:  R A Foty; C M Pfleger; G Forgacs; M S Steinberg
Journal:  Development       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 6.868

View more
  5 in total

1.  Extracellular Matrix Determines Biomechanical Properties of Chondrospheres during Their Maturation In Vitro.

Authors:  Nikolai P Omelyanenko; Pavel A Karalkin; Elena A Bulanova; Elizaveta V Koudan; Vladislav A Parfenov; Sergei A Rodionov; Alisa D Knyazeva; Vladimir A Kasyanov; Igor I Babichenko; Tamara Z Chkadua; Yusef D Khesuani; Anna A Gryadunova; Vladimir A Mironov
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  Fibronectin matrix-mediated cohesion suppresses invasion of prostate cancer cells.

Authors:  Dongxuan Jia; Ildiko Entersz; Christine Butler; Ramsey A Foty
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 4.430

3.  The Role of Extracellular Matrix Expression, ERK1/2 Signaling and Cell Cohesiveness for Cartilage Yield from iPSCs.

Authors:  Justyna Buchert; Solvig Diederichs; Ursula Kreuser; Christian Merle; Wiltrud Richter
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-09-02       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  Dexamethasone-Mediated Activation of Fibronectin Matrix Assembly Reduces Dispersal of Primary Human Glioblastoma Cells.

Authors:  Stephen Shannon; Connan Vaca; Dongxuan Jia; Ildiko Entersz; Andrew Schaer; Jonathan Carcione; Michael Weaver; Yoav Avidar; Ryan Pettit; Mohan Nair; Atif Khan; Ramsey A Foty
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Production of large numbers of size-controlled tumor spheroids using microwell plates.

Authors:  Golsa Razian; Yang Yu; Mark Ungrin
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 1.355

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.